LTB 547/17 - Royal Mail Group dispute : High Court judgment and National Briefing : & Video

jetblack · Post by **jetblack** » 14 Oct 2017, 22:43

goddard7 wrote:Why did we not take legal action against RM

You are assuming its a level playing field. It isn't. Welcome to the cruel world.

k979aaa · Post by **k979aaa** » 14 Oct 2017, 22:43

mark.cup wrote:The only serious leverage is straight out the window great planning by the union...

Why wasn't it them in the driving seat and this process started as soon as Royal Mail announced the closure of the pension plan?

Problem began ten years ago when you concede anything they the vultures will come back for more but the final salary one 10 years ago robbed most members of a decent life after work but also left out a pension for those who filled the vacated job's since then. And that's a lot of people who don't have a secure pension kicking the can to the kerb like we did in 2006 will not work anymore we need a better pension for all it may not be a final salary scheme but one where those at the top don't milk our pension's for their own as is the case now!

goddard7 · Post by **goddard7** » 15 Oct 2017, 02:06

jetblack wrote:
goddard7 wrote:Why did we not take legal action against RM
You are assuming its a level playing field. It isn't. Welcome to the cruel world.

Cruel world?.......Why enter an agreement that you are not prepared to challenge by legal means in the event of the employer transgressing?
Over £100.000 wasted,that is the stark reality.