ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

CWU LTB's
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by fishtank »

POSTMAN wrote:Ok and no doubt i'm going to get jumped on here,the tin hat is on,but i don't need Uncle Bob to wet nurse me with the vast majority of shite we get at my place.
D2D's being one of them.
Your absolutely right POSTMAN, .... why have a dog if you can bark yourself...it's an expensive dog after all.
Might be cheaper getting a temp in if all he has to do is cut&paste a few old LTBs.
I never thought i would hear you calling for Bobs head. :shock: :chuckle
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32587
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by POSTMAN »

fishtank wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:Ok and no doubt i'm going to get jumped on here,the tin hat is on,but i don't need Uncle Bob to wet nurse me with the vast majority of shite we get at my place.
D2D's being one of them.
Your absolutely right POSTMAN, .... why have a dog if you can bark yourself...it's an expensive dog after all.
Might be cheaper getting a temp in if all he has to do is cut&paste a few old LTBs.
I never thought i would hear you calling for Bobs head. :shock: :chuckle
LOL good point,oops.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Ahebban
Posts: 695
Joined: 19 May 2009, 13:41
Gender: Male
Location: Left of ... Left

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by Ahebban »

It is not always the fault of Unit Delivery Reps that the D2D situation is a mess at local level. Posties themselves are not particularly adept at understanding (or choose to ignore) the purpose of the 'extra time' added into the indoor work because of D2D. They continue to prep their D2D as and when it suits them and deliver it as it suits them. By doing so they relieve DOMs of the responsibility to include the extra prep time for D2D into their daily indoor work time.

Doing the job properly, following Interim Guidelines and National Agreements, prioritising Health and Safety within (and outside) the workplace will impact on the capability of Offices to complete deliveries on a daily basis - whatever Delivery Method is employed. CWU members are very quick to criticize national officiers for being 'out of touch', and rightly so when occasion arises! However, whether an Office has a Unit Rep or not, it should not prevent members from presenting an argument against any DOM attempting to impose their interpretation of agreements. Very often the Unit Delivery Rep is a lone figure when it comes to the Interim Agreement on D2Ds and DOMs use that to their advantage. For many posties 'Job and Finish' is still very much alive and kicking. They see the new arrangements regarding D2Ds as imposing on their perceived 'right' to get finished as quickly as possible, leaving Unit Delivery Reps in an impossible position - trying to defend an unwelcome agreement, however well-intentioned.
Ahebban - anglo-saxon in origin - meaning 'Wages War'

What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight, what counts is the size of the fight in the dog. - Mark Twain
celerycelery
Posts: 675
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 16:44

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by celerycelery »

Its all this "agree at a local level" that pisses me off. Just from the posts on here you find out how different ways offices do d2d's. Some do 20% a day mon to fri, some do 1/6th a day mon to sat, some chuck them all in on a monday and take where they are going over the week etc etc. As the d2d into work load was probably the biggest change in the agreement and also the loss of money from doing them surely the cwu should have set out NATIONALLY how this was going to work. They are just playing into the hands of the weak offices with poor/bullying management to do exactly what they want as soon as they say "local agreement".
whatamess!!
Posts: 279
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 17:43
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by whatamess!! »

Ahebban wrote:It is not always the fault of Unit Delivery Reps that the D2D situation is a mess at local level. Posties themselves are not particularly adept at understanding (or choose to ignore) the purpose of the 'extra time' added into the indoor work because of D2D. They continue to prep their D2D as and when it suits them and deliver it as it suits them. By doing so they relieve DOMs of the responsibility to include the extra prep time for D2D into their daily indoor work time.

Doing the job properly, following Interim Guidelines and National Agreements, prioritising Health and Safety within (and outside) the workplace will impact on the capability of Offices to complete deliveries on a daily basis - whatever Delivery Method is employed. CWU members are very quick to criticize national officiers for being 'out of touch', and rightly so when occasion arises! However, whether an Office has a Unit Rep or not, it should not prevent members from presenting an argument against any DOM attempting to impose their interpretation of agreements. Very often the Unit Delivery Rep is a lone figure when it comes to the Interim Agreement on D2Ds and DOMs use that to their advantage. For many posties 'Job and Finish' is still very much alive and kicking. They see the new arrangements regarding D2Ds as imposing on their perceived 'right' to get finished as quickly as possible, leaving Unit Delivery Reps in an impossible position - trying to defend an unwelcome agreement, however well-intentioned.
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
whatamess!!
Posts: 279
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 17:43
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by whatamess!! »

Alot of the time it's the members fault, trying to be done asap, without looking past the end of their nose, coming in early, not having a break , using own cars etc, when they stop all this crap and stick together maybe the local rep will beable to get this s**t sorted.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by fishtank »

Ahebban wrote:It is not always the fault of Unit Delivery Reps that the D2D situation is a mess at local level.
As usual Ahebban your post is spot on...the problem comes next....what to do about it?
You can only blame members for so long before you have to start looking at the structure behind them.

So.....Educate,Protect or Ignore?

Can you educate members and should reps be trying harder to educate members or is that just a waste of time?
Or do you try to protect them from themselves by agreeing everything at national level and having everything carved in stone?
Or do you just ignore the problem,have members blame HQ,HQ blame the members...and watch weak offices become weak areas and divisions?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16215
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by clashcityrocker »

fishtank wrote: Can you educate members and should reps be trying harder to educate members?
I would need full time release to even contemplate such a task.
There's none so deaf.........
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by Big Daz »

fishtank wrote:Can you educate members and should reps be trying harder to educate members or is that just a waste of time?

For me and for my DO the answer is waste of time/lost cause.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 045/11 Door to Door Arrangements January 2011

Post by Big Daz »

These extra hours BG wants have to be worked by some one, local reps dont have a magic wand that will make more staff appear. Its O/T or cut off.

My DO has survived on heavy delivery OT being booked by the staff and a few staff willing to cover cut offs on O/T.