ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Executive action

Latest news, comm's, LTB'S, and discussion on 'The pathway to change'.
TheStrangler
Posts: 218
Joined: 27 Jun 2017, 10:41
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by TheStrangler »

Is it true rm have to give 4 weeks notice for any executive action (e.g.forcing through a resign or the clocking in system) or can they literally begin when they see fit?
Post69
Posts: 195
Joined: 12 May 2017, 09:38
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by Post69 »

At the moment they are doing what they want :hmmmm going against any agreement so I would just take it they won't bat an eye lid about not giving 4 weeks notice on anything :cuppa they don't give a toss about any agreement which I think is obvious to see in anyone's eyes!
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32695
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by POSTMAN »

It's usually 28 days yes.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
wandle
Posts: 944
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 17:17
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by wandle »

TheStrangler wrote:Is it true rm have to give 4 weeks notice for any executive action (e.g.forcing through a resign or the clocking in system) or can they literally begin when they see fit?
Grab yourself one of those drivers’ “pee passes”, forget to hand it back in, and you can come and go as you please without being ‘tracked’ :-)
wandle
Posts: 944
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 17:17
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by wandle »

The more disturbing aspect to this data capture is this: at the moment, if you’re late for work, there is a procedure. Based on the circumstances, it’s either excused, or unexcused.
If late attendance caused an automatic docking of pay, that’s an outrage. You may have been delayed on public transport, due to trains being halted after a suicide, or a car driver delayed by a pile-up in fog.
If, however, managers can put a ‘flag’ on the system to allow you to be paid even when late, that means managers gaining local access to data about you, including times on / off the floor. No such access was a cornerstone on the terms of reference for AHDC trials. Managers gaining access to that sort of information should be opposed most aggressively!!
Sugar
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 431
Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 07:57
Gender: Female

Executive action

Post by Sugar »

wandle wrote:If late attendance caused an automatic docking of pay, that’s an outrage. You may have been delayed on public transport, due to trains being halted after a suicide, or a car driver delayed by a pile-up in fog.
Its not an outrage its just life in other companies. If you are late no matter what the circumstances then you're docked money as per their rules. Its your responsibility to get to work on time even if it means catching an earlier bus, train or getting in your car sooner. Been there, done that and had it docked in previous employment.
Post69
Posts: 195
Joined: 12 May 2017, 09:38
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by Post69 »

Sugar wrote:
wandle wrote:If late attendance caused an automatic docking of pay, that’s an outrage. You may have been delayed on public transport, due to trains being halted after a suicide, or a car driver delayed by a pile-up in fog.
Its not an outrage its just life in other companies. If you are late no matter what the circumstances then you're docked money as per their rules. Its your responsibility to get to work on time even if it means catching an earlier bus, train or getting in your car sooner. Been there, done that and had it docked in previous employment.
Unfortunately you are correct this is the way working life is outside of royal mail (your late your docked ) but they don't have what we have.........a royal mail manager over seeing it that's the difference :arrrghhh
Sugar
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 431
Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 07:57
Gender: Female

Executive action

Post by Sugar »

Post69 wrote:
Sugar wrote:
wandle wrote:If late attendance caused an automatic docking of pay, that’s an outrage. You may have been delayed on public transport, due to trains being halted after a suicide, or a car driver delayed by a pile-up in fog.
Its not an outrage its just life in other companies. If you are late no matter what the circumstances then you're docked money as per their rules. Its your responsibility to get to work on time even if it means catching an earlier bus, train or getting in your car sooner. Been there, done that and had it docked in previous employment.
Unfortunately you are correct this is the way working life is outside of royal mail (your late your docked ) but they don't have what we have.........a royal mail manager over seeing it that's the difference :arrrghhh
If its done correctly then all adjustments like being late would/should be done offsite at HR/Wages or whatever they are going to call it. But I do agree this is royal mail and there's a big chance it'll have some serious teething issues like anything else they've brought in during my time.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by daveyeff »

wandle wrote:The more disturbing aspect to this data capture is this: at the moment, if you’re late for work, there is a procedure. Based on the circumstances, it’s either excused, or unexcused.
If late attendance caused an automatic docking of pay, that’s an outrage. You may have been delayed on public transport, due to trains being halted after a suicide, or a car driver delayed by a pile-up in fog.
If, however, managers can put a ‘flag’ on the system to allow you to be paid even when late, that means managers gaining local access to data about you, including times on / off the floor. No such access was a cornerstone on the terms of reference for AHDC trials. Managers gaining access to that sort of information should be opposed most aggressively!!
most factories/shops have these kind of rules for being late.(or did, I am going back a bit) if you are say '5 mins' late they can dock you 15 mins, but that being the case, then you would have every right not to start work until they start paying you. so if you are due to start at say 7.am but get in for 7.05am, and they dock you 15mins, then you would be totally in your rights to sit on your arse until 7.15.
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3193
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by Acca Dacca »

Sugar wrote:
wandle wrote:If late attendance caused an automatic docking of pay, that’s an outrage. You may have been delayed on public transport, due to trains being halted after a suicide, or a car driver delayed by a pile-up in fog.
Its not an outrage its just life in other companies. If you are late no matter what the circumstances then you're docked money as per their rules. Its your responsibility to get to work on time even if it means catching an earlier bus, train or getting in your car sooner. Been there, done that and had it docked in previous employment.
Difference is, most of these other companies managed to implement it ( clocking in and deduction of pay ) without a strong union opposition

We have a strong union membership unlike most other companies where they can bring in what they want without any agreements etc

Whats point in having a strong union if you just sit back and say 'ah well other companies do it so we cant complain'
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
twoloops
Posts: 2002
Joined: 24 May 2017, 20:52
Gender: Male
Location: Sheffield

Executive action

Post by twoloops »

If clocking out on time surly that also ends the claiming of a break at the end of the shift?
Hitcher
Posts: 1474
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 09:59
Gender: Male

Executive action

Post by Hitcher »

twoloops wrote:If clocking out on time surly that also ends the claiming of a break at the end of the shift?
Yes.

Why are people so opposed to actually having to take their paid for break?
Sugar
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 431
Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 07:57
Gender: Female

Executive action

Post by Sugar »

Acca Dacca wrote:
Sugar wrote:
wandle wrote:If late attendance caused an automatic docking of pay, that’s an outrage. You may have been delayed on public transport, due to trains being halted after a suicide, or a car driver delayed by a pile-up in fog.
Its not an outrage its just life in other companies. If you are late no matter what the circumstances then you're docked money as per their rules. Its your responsibility to get to work on time even if it means catching an earlier bus, train or getting in your car sooner. Been there, done that and had it docked in previous employment.
Difference is, most of these other companies managed to implement it ( clocking in and deduction of pay ) without a strong union opposition

We have a strong union membership unlike most other companies where they can bring in what they want without any agreements etc

Whats point in having a strong union if you just sit back and say 'ah well other companies do it so we cant complain'
My clocking in and out card from 1988 and we had a very strong unionised workforce.

Clocking in and out isn't something that's just happened in the last decade it's been around for hundreds of years. Royal mail are the only company I've ever worked at that didn't require you to clocking in and out using a machine of some sort. Using pen and paper has been open to abuse and has been abused for as long as I've worked here especially when people used to log their own overtime.

If and when the general public get to hear that employees are kicking off about having to clock in and out everyday they are not going to have any sympathy and probably think we are just being childish.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Sugar
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 431
Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 07:57
Gender: Female

Executive action

Post by Sugar »

twoloops wrote:If clocking out on time surly that also ends the claiming of a break at the end of the shift?
IIRC it's supposed to be against the law to move your break to the end of a shift and then go home early.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16464
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Executive action

Post by clashcityrocker »

Sugar wrote:
twoloops wrote:If clocking out on time surly that also ends the claiming of a break at the end of the shift?
IIRC it's supposed to be against the law to move your break to the end of a shift and then go home early.
It is against the Working Time Directive to put all of the 20 minutes of your legal entitlement at the end (or the beginning) of the shift if you are working more than a 6 hour day.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.