ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Latest news, comm's, LTB'S, and discussion on 'The pathway to change'.
wacko74
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1572
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 20:35
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by wacko74 »

Martin Walsh wrote:
08 Dec 2020, 16:52
No one knows whether letter traffic will come back to some degree ,
In my office I'd say letter volumes, in terms of ''business mail'' aka junk mail, has already fully recovered (and some) from the drop off we saw in the first few weeks of lockdown no.1.
Gasman11
Posts: 272
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 14:07
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by Gasman11 »

Woody Guthrie wrote:
09 Dec 2020, 00:17
Everybody doesn't need to have the vaccine to "return to normal".

In theory once you vaccinate the over 55s and clinically vulnerable you've reduced the risk of serious illness and death to a level no higher than normal flu.

Once you reach that point you run out of arguments against van sharing.
I may not be in one of the at risk or vulnerable groups but i'd still be reluctant to van share as i dont really fancy getting long covid either tbh and the long term health implications will obviously only be understood in the coming months/years.
yellowbelly
Posts: 3649
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by yellowbelly »

Gasman11 wrote:
09 Dec 2020, 17:30
Woody Guthrie wrote:
09 Dec 2020, 00:17
Everybody doesn't need to have the vaccine to "return to normal".

In theory once you vaccinate the over 55s and clinically vulnerable you've reduced the risk of serious illness and death to a level no higher than normal flu.

Once you reach that point you run out of arguments against van sharing.
I may not be in one of the at risk or vulnerable groups but i'd still be reluctant to van share as i dont really fancy getting long covid either tbh and the long term health implications will obviously only be understood in the coming months/years.
And has anyone declared how long the vaccine gives immunity for....?
Gasman11
Posts: 272
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 14:07
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by Gasman11 »

yellowbelly wrote:
09 Dec 2020, 18:01
Gasman11 wrote:
09 Dec 2020, 17:30
Woody Guthrie wrote:
09 Dec 2020, 00:17
Everybody doesn't need to have the vaccine to "return to normal".

In theory once you vaccinate the over 55s and clinically vulnerable you've reduced the risk of serious illness and death to a level no higher than normal flu.

Once you reach that point you run out of arguments against van sharing.
I may not be in one of the at risk or vulnerable groups but i'd still be reluctant to van share as i dont really fancy getting long covid either tbh and the long term health implications will obviously only be understood in the coming months/years.
And has anyone declared how long the vaccine gives immunity for....?
Don't know officially, but I'd hazard a guess it'd be something along the lines of 3 to 6 months, ie to cover a particular wave of the virus.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by daveyeff »

if its like flu and mutates to a different strain there will need to be a different vaccine for it each year. flu is constantly changing and mutating so the old vaccine becomes obsolete.
mickeymacca
Posts: 501
Joined: 21 Jun 2012, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by mickeymacca »

Yeah I think I heard that from a scientist speaking on Five Live's Your Call on Monday or Tuesday, they think it may be an annual injection like the flu vaccine. He also said that once the DNA code for Covid 19 was established, an effective vaccine was found in a few days, it's reaching the efficacy and regulatory criteria that has taken the large period of the time, quite rightly. So a response to a mutation of the Covid 19 infection may not be as much of a hurdle to overcome as it sounds to an oaf like myself now those standards have been met. It is just tweaking the current vaccine with the knowledge now that it will carry no widespread adverse effect......fascinating listen, would recommend.....
'Libraries gave us power'
postslippete
Posts: 4126
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by postslippete »

I know of someone that went on a plane on holiday this year, yet they won't van share due to the coronavirus :crazy: :crazy:

Where would the postie stand in the future on possible issues of non-compliance given this??
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
gary1975
Posts: 482
Joined: 16 Apr 2011, 13:41
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by gary1975 »

Will we get an update about the update that basically didn’t update us today :cuppa
Vwtouran
Posts: 95
Joined: 26 Jan 2016, 18:54
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by Vwtouran »

Is today going to be the day?
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by Woody Guthrie »

In terms of the USO the unions policy remains we want to protect the USO 6 day service.
Here's the rub though Martin, the branches and the majority of the membership think that means the union's policy is to protect the 6 day letters delivery but we both know that isn't true.

What you really mean is that the union is prepared to settle for some kind of USO 6 day service even if that means losing 6 day letters and maybe having Tracked designated a USO product.

Who knows it might be the sensible way to go but in the meantime branches and members are going to be wasting their breath fighting for something HQ has already given up on.

Do you know what's wrong with your position Martin, it's fundamentally dishonest.

You believe if you technically on paper protect the 6 day USO by moving the goalposts that's an acceptable solution but if in the process you can't admit that that's exactly what you're aiming for you're lying to the membership.

A union is not a business, a bunch of disreputable lawyers or some sleazy political party, it should never look to tell anything other than the naked truth to its members, not look for some slippery technical get out clause.

If HQ has accepted that the 5 day letters delivery will probably go in 2022 or even earlier the members deserve to know as early as possible.
Only dead fish follow the current
Rumple
Posts: 428
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 10:45
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by Rumple »

Trying to stay positive throughout all this half-truth telling is becoming impossible.
TheTrolleyMan
Posts: 776
Joined: 13 Mar 2017, 15:39
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by TheTrolleyMan »

Rumple wrote:
11 Dec 2020, 15:07
Trying to stay positive throughout all this half-truth telling is becoming impossible.
I think Mr Pullingers position at the CWU is becoming untenable ! Even Dave Ward is distancing himself from this " Merry - go -round " of BS
derricksmyth
Posts: 353
Joined: 13 Sep 2012, 17:58
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by derricksmyth »

I agree with your sentiments entirely Woodie, surely we should be told asap if the 6 day letter delivery is to be canned!!
gary1975
Posts: 482
Joined: 16 Apr 2011, 13:41
Gender: Male

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by gary1975 »

So mr Walsh, what is the union’s position apart from talks are resuming on Monday?
david3595
Posts: 167
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:40

Re: FAO Martin Walsh / Dingo

Post by david3595 »

On Twitter 25 mins ago when asked any update the reply from CWU was “No, as soon as we have an update we will communicate it ASAP. Apologies I don’t know how to attach a photo to messages :roll: