RMCtv : Simon Thomson "I will not be swayed on poor revisions"

[Sir Henry]

Does this Simon guy not realise that if jobs are too big it demoralises the workforce

A demoralised workforce is a positive for RM

Posties leave, Simon has to recruit and re-recruit over and over and over again

New maleable part-time recruits who can be messed about instead of old full timers on better terms? Another +

meanwhile delivery offices are short staffed meaning more pressure on the Posties that are still working and then they get fed up and leave.

"Ooh look the USO/way of working is unsustainable, have another raft of revisions" +

The amount Royal Mail spends on recruitment must be ridiculous. So many people have left and are due to leave our DO and there aren't too many people keen on working here, probably heard all the stories.

"Ditto" +

[POSTMAN]

Simon Says

I realised that we still have 17 Delivery Offices that have not competed their revisions - which we agreed as part of Pathway to Change - would all be done by November 2021 - as you will hear - revisions, and our other change activity - is a team game...

London.jpg

So, Si has started a thread on Workplace pointing out where the revisions have not even been started.
Not long after he took the Liverpool one off, the rest are from London.

Not long after all that many OPG's are now pointing out that their office is not on the list as they have not had a revision yet.


#We have the right amount of revisions not started-just not on the right spreadsheet

#Someone telling porkies?

[oypostie]

Si does seem to have a bee in his bonnet about London

[Chelseablue]

Revision = a huge mess left for the staff to sort out now

[clashcityrocker]

Not long after all that many OPG's are now pointing out that their office is not on the list as they have not had a revision yet.

#Someone telling porkies?

If your office was only due a table top revision in the first year but your office was already reaching the agreed efficiency performance there wouldn't have been any need for revision activity in the office. No?

[Chelseablue]

If the PRI for some reason has been signed off even tho its still a disaster , can they restructure dutys as they were months ago ?

[pieoftheday]

Were any of the revisions that went ahead successful?

[Woody Guthrie]

Not long after all that many OPG's are now pointing out that their office is not on the list as they have not had a revision yet.

#Someone telling porkies?

If your office was only due a table top revision in the first year but your office was already reaching the agreed efficiency performance there wouldn't have been any need for revision activity in the office. No?

I think all offices were due a revision to trigger the SWW.
I do think some revisions were so light touch because managers were so afraid of failure that some members may not have even noticed them happening.

Move street A to duty 1 and street B to duty 2, duty 1+2 are a pair anyway so just carry on as normal.

Revision done Simon.

[mjd24]

What an absolute joker this guy is. Hasnt a clue what’s actually going on at ground level. Embarrassing the stuff he keeps splashing on Workplace.

[k979aaa]

What an absolute joker this guy is. Hasnt a clue what’s actually going on at ground level. Embarrassing the stuff he keeps splashing on Workplace.

Noncess he deserves £142,000 bonus nothing to see here.