ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Latest news, comm's, LTB'S, and discussion on 'The pathway to change'.
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by aiden01 »

Chelseablue wrote:No voters , whats the point in you being in the union? Pathetic .
At least the no voters had there say ovr 40,000 didnt have a say at all..
worktotime
Posts: 2860
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by worktotime »

Woody Guthrie wrote:
Bahia Feliz wrote:Do we have to announce a strike date to keep the result active?
Not immediately.
Thursday 19th March then :left: , because can you see the company removing ALL the executive action and getting round the table with the CWU ? NO I don't think so , but I could be wrong , :crazy:
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Chelseablue wrote:No voters , whats the point in you being in the union? Pathetic .
What's the point in democracy if you're not allowed to decide for yourself which way you vote?
Only dead fish follow the current
hero22
Posts: 575
Joined: 21 Mar 2016, 19:48
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by hero22 »

What’s the point of being in the union and not voting ? Like being part of a political party and not casting a vote in the election. I’m sure the 40000 who chose not to vote will still want the union to help them in certain situations. Weakened the bargaining position for all of us now. It’s pathetic.
Scrumpy
Posts: 14
Joined: 28 Sep 2015, 20:21
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Scrumpy »

Low turnout , No votes on the up. Shows the members are losing faith with the current Union stance , time to change the Union leaders whom have lost focus on the dispute but upped their personal campaign against Rico . We need negotiators working for the members interest, not personal vendettas
olilew
Posts: 594
Joined: 19 May 2010, 22:04
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by olilew »

Scrumpy wrote:Low turnout , No votes on the up. Shows the members are losing faith with the current Union stance , time to change the Union leaders whom have lost focus on the dispute but upped their personal campaign against Rico . We need negotiators working for the members interest, not personal vendettas
We recently had the opportunity to change the union leaders and we voted them back in for another 5 years!
"Just take it out and see how you go......."
Binsey
Posts: 389
Joined: 14 Aug 2015, 17:33
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Binsey »

olilew wrote:
Scrumpy wrote:Low turnout , No votes on the up. Shows the members are losing faith with the current Union stance , time to change the Union leaders whom have lost focus on the dispute but upped their personal campaign against Rico . We need negotiators working for the members interest, not personal vendettas
We recently had the opportunity to change the union leaders and we voted them back in for another 5 years!


Forgive me if I am wrong.
But certain individuals were Unopposed......


Apathy is on the rise in our Trade Union.
Scrumpy
Posts: 14
Joined: 28 Sep 2015, 20:21
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Scrumpy »

Binsey wrote:
olilew wrote:
Scrumpy wrote:Low turnout , No votes on the up. Shows the members are losing faith with the current Union stance , time to change the Union leaders whom have lost focus on the dispute but upped their personal campaign against Rico . We need negotiators working for the members interest, not personal vendettas

We recently had the opportunity to change the union leaders and we voted them back in for another 5 years!


Forgive me if I am wrong.
But certain individuals were Unopposed......


Apathy is on the rise in our Trade Union.
I can’t remember a vote for the leadership, those two would of certainly not got my vote
heapsy
Posts: 2949
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 23:40
Gender: Male
Location: Drinking with Gangsters

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by heapsy »

hero22 wrote:I thought there were over 135000 staff in Royal Mail. The actual number of ballots sent out is a lot less than I expected. It’s hard to understand how 30000 odd people didn’t bother to vote and a good lot voted no to strike. I assume they are happy to be on the dole in the near future or running around for 12 hours a day on low wages. :arrrghhh
Probably not in the CWU. There's about 6 in our office out of about 90. Partly due to the office rep. :neutral:
Post69
Posts: 195
Joined: 12 May 2017, 09:38
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Post69 »

heapsy wrote:
hero22 wrote:I thought there were over 135000 staff in Royal Mail. The actual number of ballots sent out is a lot less than I expected. It’s hard to understand how 30000 odd people didn’t bother to vote and a good lot voted no to strike. I assume they are happy to be on the dole in the near future or running around for 12 hours a day on low wages. :arrrghhh
Probably not in the CWU. There's about 6 in our office out of about 90. Partly due to the office rep. :neutral:
Can't believe people don't join or come out of a union because of a rep :d'oh! There's always been good reps and reps that are out of their depth but you join a union to be part of a union? Rep come and go the union doesn't in times like this its probably the best thing you can do in the work place is be part of a union :cuppa
Chelseablue
Posts: 2165
Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
Gender: Female

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Chelseablue »

I meant,,non voters ppl who cdnt be bothered voting
Takeitforaride
PARCELFORCE
Posts: 31
Joined: 17 Nov 2018, 10:32
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Takeitforaride »

I agree people are losing faith with the Union. I’m my office anyway they don’t seem to be doing much. We’re getting railroaded and nothing happens. Now we’ve got a yes vote again and they instantly say they aren’t going to strike because we need to be an emergency service.

So whilst everyone locks themselves away, we’re still going, RM earn massive amounts of money for the increase in work and at the end of it, were in the exact same position and back to square one again. The CWU have killed the momentum of this dispute. It’s basically dead in the water.
richietns
Posts: 1074
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by richietns »

Takeitforaride wrote:I agree people are losing faith with the Union. I’m my office anyway they don’t seem to be doing much. We’re getting railroaded and nothing happens. Now we’ve got a yes vote again and they instantly say they aren’t going to strike because we need to be an emergency service.

So whilst everyone locks themselves away, we’re still going, RM earn massive amounts of money for the increase in work and at the end of it, were in the exact same position and back to square one again. The CWU have killed the momentum of this dispute. It’s basically dead in the water.
So we should just let RM do what ever they want and not fight at all,don't forget were on the pay were on because ov the CWU.The public could see how much were needed if were an emergency service as the CWU are proposing.
Takeitforaride
PARCELFORCE
Posts: 31
Joined: 17 Nov 2018, 10:32
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by Takeitforaride »

richietns wrote:
Takeitforaride wrote:I agree people are losing faith with the Union. I’m my office anyway they don’t seem to be doing much. We’re getting railroaded and nothing happens. Now we’ve got a yes vote again and they instantly say they aren’t going to strike because we need to be an emergency service.

So whilst everyone locks themselves away, we’re still going, RM earn massive amounts of money for the increase in work and at the end of it, were in the exact same position and back to square one again. The CWU have killed the momentum of this dispute. It’s basically dead in the water.
So we should just let RM do what ever they want and not fight at all,don't forget were on the pay were on because ov the CWU.The public could see how much were needed if were an emergency service as the CWU are proposing.
No, we keep going with the dispute, obviously.

But don’t for one minute think the public will be grateful, they won’t be and when the next ballot comes around, we’ll still be called greedy, the media will shout down the CWU during every interview and we’ll still be in the exact same position and in the meantime things will get worse at work because of all the money being thrown at RM
richietns
Posts: 1074
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Ballot result : Yes 94.5% No 5.5% : No strikes : Low turnout

Post by richietns »

The courts and coronavirus killed the momentum cwu couldnt of predicted them two outcomes surely.