ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Latest news, comm's, LTB'S, and discussion on 'The pathway to change'.
fb1969
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1693
Joined: 29 Aug 2012, 08:38
Gender: Male
Location: hiding on the backstreets

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by fb1969 »

Acca Dacca wrote:
Too much importance is put on this 'support of the general public'

Why?

What changes if every person we deliver to thinks we are greedy so and so?

Nothing.
You'd better let the CWU know that because they've stated that public support is vital in this dispute.
Royal Mail
failing the workforce, failing the public and deliberately failing mail on a daily basis for too many years.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by k979aaa »

Tricky Dicky Ricky thinks he can subjugate 100,000 postal workers where as we as a collective only need his head and his leader to go and go now bugger off to Scotland and Switzerland!
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3193
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by Acca Dacca »

fb1969 wrote:
Acca Dacca wrote:
Too much importance is put on this 'support of the general public'

Why?

What changes if every person we deliver to thinks we are greedy so and so?

Nothing.
You'd better let the CWU know that because they've stated that public support is vital in this dispute.
It isnt though.

The general public arent Royal Mail's main customers either - the companies are

Maybe when the general public OWNED Royal Mail before privatisation their support would be important - not this time though imo
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
britwrit
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 964
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 15:12

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by britwrit »

Just get rid of work-time learning. That's a half-hour right there.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12064
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by SpacePhoenix »

If letters and flats ever ended up being 3-4 day delivery spans then I can see RM having 1 maybe two MCs that would operate as letter and flat offices, processing letters and flats for the whole country with every other MC becoming parcels only with a PSM (don't know if sorting down to walk is doable on a PSM)
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3193
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by Acca Dacca »

britwrit wrote:Just get rid of work-time learning. That's a half-hour right there.
Work time learning is for OUR benefit - its half an hour spent sitting on our arses rather than walking the streets

What do you think theyd replace that half hour with?
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
britwrit
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 964
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 15:12

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by britwrit »

Acca Dacca wrote:
britwrit wrote:Just get rid of work-time learning. That's a half-hour right there.
Work time learning is for OUR benefit - its half an hour spent sitting on our arses rather than walking the streets

What do you think theyd replace that half hour with?
If they got rid of it, all they'd need to do is find another 30 minutes out of the week to reduce it.

Would you rather be sitting around at work or at home?
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3193
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by Acca Dacca »

britwrit wrote:
Acca Dacca wrote:
britwrit wrote:Just get rid of work-time learning. That's a half-hour right there.
Work time learning is for OUR benefit - its half an hour spent sitting on our arses rather than walking the streets

What do you think theyd replace that half hour with?
If they got rid of it, all they'd need to do is find another 30 minutes out of the week to reduce it.

Would you rather be sitting around at work or at home?
I'd rather spend half an hour sitting on my arse watching lies than doing half an hour extra lapsing

Do away with WTL and what will the part timers have in place of it? More outdoor work thats what.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
GRS
Posts: 812
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by GRS »

Had a bloke down from RM this morning to give us a talk and sell their vision for the future. One of the things he said was that they really want to substantially grow the amount of smaller packets the business handles and grab the work away from DPD,Yodel etc. He said that by losing larger parcels to the nearest LAT office this growth in smaller items that the walking postmen would handle will protect our jobs. Anyone else had this put to them?
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12064
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by SpacePhoenix »

GRS wrote:Had a bloke down from RM this morning to give us a talk and sell their vision for the future. One of the things he said was that they really want to substantially grow the amount of smaller packets the business handles and grab the work away from DPD,Yodel etc. He said that by losing larger parcels to the nearest LAT office this growth in smaller items that the walking postmen would handle will protect our jobs. Anyone else had this put to them?
I've seen mentions of I think it was 100 selections on a PSM. It's probably not too much of a stretch to have PSMs sort down to walk level or at least down to a batch of walks. When small packets are being sorted to walks in DOs, typically do you have a drop bag frame with a bag for each walk or do you have a primary setup where you sort to a batch of walks then a secondary setup for each batch where you sort down to walks?
Kirkz
Posts: 25
Joined: 07 Feb 2020, 10:03
Gender: Male

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by Kirkz »

Why didn't management think about the structural changes before they decided to make us a parcels company?
Now all these years on apparently it's our fault the company is failing because we're all lazy greedy posties.
They never looked at all the free time we all gave them back in the day when we all came in early and worked through our meal breaks, they just said Oh you're all finishing early so you must not be doing enough.
Now it's all coming back to bite them on the arse and they still can't see why.
The sooner we all show the greedy part time CEO that we're not going to fall for his smoke and mirrors tricks and give him a bloody nose with a massive YES vote the better.
Productivity is a two way street not just an I'm right you're wrong because I'm the boss thing.
GRS
Posts: 812
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

RMtv : Trading update : Ricky McAulay on The CWU ballot : Future of letters and parcels

Post by GRS »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
GRS wrote:Had a bloke down from RM this morning to give us a talk and sell their vision for the future. One of the things he said was that they really want to substantially grow the amount of smaller packets the business handles and grab the work away from DPD,Yodel etc. He said that by losing larger parcels to the nearest LAT office this growth in smaller items that the walking postmen would handle will protect our jobs. Anyone else had this put to them?
I've seen mentions of I think it was 100 selections on a PSM. It's probably not too much of a stretch to have PSMs sort down to walk level or at least down to a batch of walks. When small packets are being sorted to walks in DOs, typically do you have a drop bag frame with a bag for each walk or do you have a primary setup where you sort to a batch of walks then a secondary setup for each batch where you sort down to walks?
In my office it’s primary sorting only. Not big enough to have secondary sorting.