ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

USPS - Postman Sues after Second Attack from 'Vicious' Dog

Competitors and other mail organisations around the world news and discussion.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72496
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

USPS - Postman Sues after Second Attack from 'Vicious' Dog

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://houston.injuryboard.com/property ... eid=283164" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Beaumont mail carrier Marcus Lockhart has filed a lawsuit against a dog owner after he was attacked twice by the same dog in less than a year.

According to the lawsuit, the first attack occurred on July 28, 2008 when the large black dog came out of a gate that was left open. Lockhart was able to shield himself from the dog but did suffer a cut on his hand. The second incident occurred on April 19, 2009 when the same dog again attacked Lockhart. In both instances animal control was called.

Lockhart claims that the dog has a “vicious nature” and propensity to attack.

Lockhart has every right to be angry and even file a lawsuit in this situation. Sure dealing with dogs and other dangers of the environment comes with the territory of being a mail man, but dog owners have an obligation to keep their animals restrained.

And I understand that peopel make mistakes and accidents happen but two attacks on the same person in a year is more than just an accident.

Thankfully Lockhart was able to defend himself and was not seriously injured in either attack, but what if it had been a child instead?

My thought is that we would be looking at a very different story.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.