Morgan Stanley cuts Royal Mail target price, says valuation "too generous"
http://sharecast.com/news/morgan-stanle ... 87799.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
Morgan Stanley has noted "continued operational risk" at Royal Mail, as it maintained its 'underweight' rating on the postal delivery group.
The bank cut its target price for the shares from 350p to 340p on Tuesday, dragging the shares down 3.6% to 431.8p by 10:36.
Morgan Stanley said that its recent concerns about a slowdown in revenue growth are "playing out as expected" at Royal Mail.
Ahead of the next financial year ending March 2016, the bank warned that declines in letter mail volumes could pick up due to weaker macro growth in 2015 and two fewer working days, while parcel revenue growth is still challenging due to intense competition in the industry.
It also said that cost-base improvements are "limited" due to higher non-cash pension expenses, fewer working days and the 'rolling off' of cost-savings initiatives from the previous year.
Meanwhile, the General Logistics Systems (GLS) business operating in Europe is trading solidly, but currency movements and recent investment will have a negative impact, Morgan Stanley said.
Given these pressures, the bank reckons that Royal Mail's valuation - shares trade on a 6.6% free cash flow yield for this year, in line with peers - is "too generous".
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Morgan Stanley cuts RM target price valuation "too generous"
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72559
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Morgan Stanley cuts RM target price valuation "too generous"
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
oypostie
- Posts: 898
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 13:39
Re: Morgan Stanley cuts RM target price valuation "too gener
but then again that is all likely to be cancelled out by all the extra elelection mailAhead of the next financial year ending March 2016, the bank warned that declines in letter mail volumes could pick up due to weaker macro growth in 2015 and two fewer working days
-
beezet
- Posts: 93
- Joined: 06 Dec 2013, 18:56
- Gender: Male
Re: Morgan Stanley cuts RM target price valuation "too gener
And the savings on diesel 
-
SW17
- Posts: 89
- Joined: 10 Oct 2007, 12:17
Re: Morgan Stanley cuts RM target price valuation "too gener
Plus VR's, lapsing.....all irrelevant, i'm sure they try and drive the price down so they can buy on the cheap - all bs 
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: Morgan Stanley cuts RM target price valuation "too gener
Morgan Stanley...........didn't they get money from the government to stop them from collapsing because they didn't understand how the markets worked??
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
wacko74
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 20:35
- Gender: Male
Re: Morgan Stanley cuts RM target price valuation "too gener
That's exactly what all these supposed ''independent'' financial advisers do... manipulate share prices for their own ends and agendas creating self fulfilling prophecies, talking them up when they want to sell and talking them down when they want to buy, I can't understand why so much attention is paid to their recommendations.SW17 wrote:Plus VR's, lapsing.....all irrelevant, i'm sure they try and drive the price down so they can buy on the cheap - all bs