http://news.sky.com/story/1151131/royal ... -investors" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Fears have been raised over small-time investors buying shares in Royal Mail, as big City firms are set to buy the majority of those on offer.
Hedge funds and City banks are allowed 70% of the shares being offered in the majority sell-off of the postal delivery firm.
City investors have also been tipped to make up to 40% instant profit amid claims that the business has been undervalued by more than a third.
The Government has valued the Royal Mail at £3.3bn and is selling up to 62% of the business - including a 10% stake being handed for free to Royal Mail employees.
But analysts at Panmure Gordon told The Daily Telegraph the company could be worth as much as £4.5bn.
The shares have been priced at the high end of the £2.60p to £3.30p estimate, but are expected to rise in value when the company floats on the stock market next week.
The deadline for applications to buy stock closes at midnight on Tuesday, and veteran City expert David Buik said big investors had already applied for hundreds of millions of shares.
The minimum investment allowed is £750, which is forecast to return a profit of £300 if sold after flotation.
Former home secretary Alan Johnson, who worked as a postman as a teenager, told the newspaper: "There is a vast difference between pricing Royal Mail shares conservatively and undervaluing them by £1bn.
"This is ripping off the taxpayer on an epic scale."
On Sunday, Labour slammed the privatisation and said the process should be halted.
Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna, speaking on Sky's Murnaghan programme, said scrapping the move would prevent a "massive bonanza" for City speculators.
He said to proceed with the sell-off would not only have "huge consequences for consumers and businesses" - but the taxpayer would also be left "short-changed".
The prospectus also highlights sites in London at Mount Pleasant and Nine Elms as being "surplus", with reports saying they are worth between £500m and £1bn each, according to Labour.
Meanwhile, Royal Mail chief executive Moya Greene has written to employees offering them £300 not to take part in impending industrial action.
Workers have been offered a pay increase of 8.6% over three years, including a £300 lump sum in year one if there is no strike.
The Communication Workers Union is asking members to vote on industrial action and the ballot closes later this month.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Royal Mail Sale: Fears For Small Investors
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72557
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Royal Mail Sale: Fears For Small Investors
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
I-POSTIE
- Posts: 78
- Joined: 09 Mar 2007, 21:51
- Gender: Male
SOMETHING STINKS
In my 24th September post (http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 38&t=55474) I commented, “Does it not smack of the rich making the rich, richer or am I just being cynical?” Today’s news revealing the undervaluing of Royal Mail shares leaves me in no doubt as to my cynicism being well placed concerning the motives of the Conservative governments allocation of shares. It is grossly disrespectful to the people of this country for this government to allow such an disproportional percentage of the shares to made available to the financial organizations whose negligent, loss-making, skulduggery has left so many in monetary chaos, only able to look on, as they lap up on the cheap and reap the rewards. Is it just another way of making yet another charitable donation from the public, whom think they have done enough to keep these overpaid, arrogant bankers, swigging champagne and ridding in Rollers? That is just disgusting!
The Conservative government still has time to pull out of this debacle, however, they are doomed if they do and doomed if they don’t. Should they pull out they will be lambasted by the banks and other vultures whom supported them for their own ends; and if they don’t they shall be accountable to us, the tax paying public, for the massive margin of error in not securing the real value of Royal Mail.
I am hoping a legal challenge arises. Surely, it has to be illegal to put too small a price on public assets for sale when so many advise that the government has priced it too cheaply? Clearly something stinks.
________________________________________________________
KEEP ROYAL MAIL IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN! 
The Conservative government still has time to pull out of this debacle, however, they are doomed if they do and doomed if they don’t. Should they pull out they will be lambasted by the banks and other vultures whom supported them for their own ends; and if they don’t they shall be accountable to us, the tax paying public, for the massive margin of error in not securing the real value of Royal Mail.
I am hoping a legal challenge arises. Surely, it has to be illegal to put too small a price on public assets for sale when so many advise that the government has priced it too cheaply? Clearly something stinks.
________________________________________________________
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Royal Mail Sale: Fears For Small Investors
"It is grossly disrespectful to the people of this country for this government to allow such an disproportional percentage of the shares to made available to the financial organizations whose negligent, loss-making, skulduggery has left so many in monetary chaos"
Indeed, but it's a third of a century ago that the government last had any respect for the people. 