ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Privatisation

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
biscuit1957
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 161
Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 16:04
Gender: Male
Location: Swindon Mail Centre has given up

Privatisation

Post by biscuit1957 »

In Bristol today Mr Tony Fox, Processing Director,held a forum for postal workers to try and brain wash us in saying privatisation was good for us the Postal Workers,
Mr Fox Mr Cable Ms Green get it into your heads the postal workers and public do not want privatisation and we will fight you all the way.Why do top management of
Royal Mail want this?Why don't the top management(not their lackeys)support their own workers and reject this?or is there a pay off for the top people,remember when we win, you the so called top people will be out of work.Britain stand together and stop this fantastic institution from going into foreign hands
There is a forgotten, well almost a forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.

That word is ENGLAND!!!
ass asin
Posts: 157
Joined: 26 Oct 2009, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation

Post by ass asin »

Vince cable, michael fallon, tories , lib dems, moya greene, royal mail board, business leaders and all of that ilk. Please dont judge posties using your own low moral standards. We dont want your shares or your blood money. We are not ruthless or unscrupulous. We dont measure success by the size of our bank accounts or by the trimming of people's jobs. So keep your shares and I will keep my values. I know who will be the richer.
Cheesed off lol after being force fed privatisation propaganda at work for the umpteenth time. I wish we could concentrate on delivering letters lol
biscuit1957
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 161
Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 16:04
Gender: Male
Location: Swindon Mail Centre has given up

Re: Privatisation

Post by biscuit1957 »

Every week at wtl on RM tv brain wash material,every week through the post the same thing,BUT.......WHY arnt we hearing from the union??? :vcfo
There is a forgotten, well almost a forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.

That word is ENGLAND!!!
Phantom
Posts: 1234
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 18:17
Gender: Female
Location: New York

Re: Privatisation

Post by Phantom »

A bad idea takes a lot of selling!
CUT OFF!!!
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Privatisation

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

Not forgetting the constant crap we get through the post at home, some of which arrived again this morning.
Sending it back, unopened.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
coolasluck
Posts: 63
Joined: 29 Jan 2011, 16:38
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation

Post by coolasluck »

ass asin wrote:Vince cable, michael fallon, tories , lib dems, moya greene, royal mail board, business leaders and all of that ilk. Please dont judge posties using your own low moral standards. We dont want your shares or your blood money. We are not ruthless or unscrupulous. We dont measure success by the size of our bank accounts or by the trimming of people's jobs. So keep your shares and I will keep my values. I know who will be the richer.
Cheesed off lol after being force fed privatisation propaganda at work for the umpteenth time. I wish we could concentrate on delivering letters lol



Nice posting and so true
biscuit1957
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 161
Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 16:04
Gender: Male
Location: Swindon Mail Centre has given up

Re: Privatisation

Post by biscuit1957 »

UnhappyGremlin wrote:Not forgetting the constant crap we get through the post at home, some of which arrived again this morning.
Sending it back, unopened.
That's a brilliant idea,send all the s**t back to Royal Mail not wanted :chuckle
There is a forgotten, well almost a forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.

That word is ENGLAND!!!
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Privatisation

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

biscuit1957 wrote:
UnhappyGremlin wrote:Not forgetting the constant crap we get through the post at home, some of which arrived again this morning.
Sending it back, unopened.
That's a brilliant idea,send all the s**t back to Royal Mail not wanted :chuckle
I only keep my wage slip. Everything thing else goes back. No longer get the courier either.
Think everybody should do it.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
iainwilson
PARCELFORCE
Posts: 141
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 22:07
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation

Post by iainwilson »

ass asin wrote:Vince cable, michael fallon, tories , lib dems, moya greene, royal mail board, business leaders and all of that ilk. Please dont judge posties using your own low moral standards. We dont want your shares or your blood money. We are not ruthless or unscrupulous. We dont measure success by the size of our bank accounts or by the trimming of people's jobs. So keep your shares and I will keep my values. I know who will be the richer.
Cheesed off lol after being force fed privatisation propaganda at work for the umpteenth time. I wish we could concentrate on delivering letters lol
I think you will find all politicians Labour included want the privatisation. I don't think it's a bad thing for Parcelforce but RM is a bad idea m'kay

:wave
frankfurters
Posts: 36
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 22:29
Gender: Female

Re: Privatisation

Post by frankfurters »

The amount of times I heard the words "free shares" in the work time learning meeting! Talk about brain wash! :crazy: :thumbdown
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72557
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Privatisation

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

What does FREE SHARES really mean

Further cuts in T&Cs
Reduction in Headcount
Everlasting chase for profits.
Employment Insecurity

Supplements Disappearing
Harder Duties
Attacks on the Union
Reduction of the USO
Escalting Industrial Unrest
Scaling back services

Nothing is ever really Free, they just hide the costs.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation

Post by Brain Fury »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:What does FREE SHARES really mean

Further cuts in T&Cs
Reduction in Headcount
Everlasting chase for profits.
Employment Insecurity

Supplements Disappearing
Harder Duties
Attacks on the Union
Reduction of the USO
Escalting Industrial Unrest
Scaling back services

Nothing is ever really Free, they just hide the costs.
Unlike the last 10 years of Government ownership when none of those things have happened of course. I really don't understand why it is thought that the Government makes a better shareholder than anybody else.
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Privatisation

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

Brain Fury wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:What does FREE SHARES really mean

Further cuts in T&Cs
Reduction in Headcount
Everlasting chase for profits.
Employment Insecurity

Supplements Disappearing
Harder Duties
Attacks on the Union
Reduction of the USO
Escalting Industrial Unrest
Scaling back services

Nothing is ever really Free, they just hide the costs.
Unlike the last 10 years of Government ownership when none of those things have happened of course. I really don't understand why it is thought that the Government makes a better shareholder than anybody else.
At least under Government ownership, we know where any potential profits will end up.
If privatised, any profits will line the pockets of the chosen few, which will be increased ruthlessly at our cost.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
frankfurters
Posts: 36
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 22:29
Gender: Female

Re: Privatisation

Post by frankfurters »

And the last time we were given free shares, a month before they were due to be cashed we had another meeting telling us they were no longer available and that they were only "phantom shares" :shock: ;liar
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation

Post by Brain Fury »

UnhappyGremlin wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:What does FREE SHARES really mean

Further cuts in T&Cs
Reduction in Headcount
Everlasting chase for profits.
Employment Insecurity

Supplements Disappearing
Harder Duties
Attacks on the Union
Reduction of the USO
Escalting Industrial Unrest
Scaling back services

Nothing is ever really Free, they just hide the costs.
Unlike the last 10 years of Government ownership when none of those things have happened of course. I really don't understand why it is thought that the Government makes a better shareholder than anybody else.
At least under Government ownership, we know where any potential profits will end up.
If privatised, any profits will line the pockets of the chosen few, which will be increased ruthlessly at our cost.
O.k so where will any profits end up if we stay under Government ownership? If they are not reinvested in the business does it matter? And you're saying that if privatised any profit will be taken out of the business as a dividend to shareholders (I assume that's who you mean by the chosen few)? Not might be, will be and not some of it, all of it? That all seems very definite. How can you be so sure? If I were a shareholder (and of course I will be) I would want most of the profits invested in the business so that it grows and prospers and gives me a better chance of future dividends and the opportunity to sell my shares at a profit.