ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32698
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by POSTMAN »

Privatiation is the incidence or process of transferring ownership of a business, enterprise, agency or public service from the public sector (government) to the private sector ("business"). In a broader sense, privatisation refers to transfer of any government function to the private sector - including governmental functions like revenue collection and law enforcement.

The term "privatisation" also has been used to describe two unrelated transactions. The first is a buyout, by the majority owner, of all shares of a public corporation or holding company's stock, privatising a publicly traded stock, and often described as private equity. The second is a demutualisation of a mutual organisation or cooperative to form a joint stock company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatization" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16467
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by clashcityrocker »

I like this bit:

However some Austrian school economists and anarcho-capitalists would prefer that every function of the state be privatised including defence and dispute resolution.

If indeed we do have some Austrian school economists and anarcho-capitalists amongst us tonight, it could well be a lively debate.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
pokos27
Posts: 657
Joined: 15 Apr 2010, 19:32
Gender: Male

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by pokos27 »

mises.org.
All about the Austrian school of economics.
Houses with long pathways would pay £1 per item extra.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16467
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by clashcityrocker »

What about these:

Their recommendations are similar to, but further reaching, than the minarchist ideas of Chicago school economists.

Is someone making all this s**t up?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
fionalou
Posts: 14
Joined: 09 Jul 2012, 22:08
Gender: Female

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by fionalou »

when is royal mail going to be priviated. someone said its from next year 2013.
:nana :nana :Boo hoo!
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by DGP1 »

fionalou wrote:when is royal mail going to be priviated. someone said its from next year 2013.
:nana :nana :Boo hoo!
Only when someone is willing (or indeed able) to buy us.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72544
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

DGP1 wrote:
fionalou wrote:when is royal mail going to be priviated. someone said its from next year 2013.
:nana :nana :Boo hoo!
Only when someone is willing (or indeed able) to buy us.
Don't forget it could be a share issue - just tell Sid not to buy.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
barbario
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 411
Joined: 31 Jul 2007, 11:28

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by barbario »

We are being so badly managed that whoever is stupid enough to buy us, would be buying a basket case. For example,far to much property and land is being sold off that we will not be able to cope.:nana :crazy:
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by DGP1 »

barbario wrote:We are being so badly managed that whoever is stupid enough to buy us, would be buying a basket case. For example,far to much property and land is being sold off that we will not be able to cope.:nana :crazy:
We're not able to cope now...............but then it's all our fault :nervous
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
freelunch
Posts: 358
Joined: 14 Oct 2012, 20:39
Gender: Male

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by freelunch »

barbario wrote:We are being so badly managed that whoever is stupid enough to buy us, would be buying a basket case. For example,far to much property and land is being sold off that we will not be able to cope.:nana :crazy:
In the case of privatisation, out of town property will be bought cheaply by loading debt (currently at low interest rates) onto the company. This will facilitate bigger regional delivery offices to be built and the closure of local delivery offices which are often in high value locations. The proceeds from theses sales will go directly into the coffers of the new owners.

The Austrian School has no influence whatsoever in present-day economics where the wealthy elite control the political class to use the state to protect and serve only their interests.
"Everybody has a plan.. until they get punched in the face" - Mike Tyson
Navalron
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1044
Joined: 12 Aug 2017, 10:40
Gender: Male
Location: Glasgow

Re: Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by Navalron »

freelunch wrote:
barbario wrote:We are being so badly managed that whoever is stupid enough to buy us, would be buying a basket case. For example,far to much property and land is being sold off that we will not be able to cope.:nana :crazy:
In the case of privatisation, out of town property will be bought cheaply by loading debt (currently at low interest rates) onto the company. This will facilitate bigger regional delivery offices to be built and the closure of local delivery offices which are often in high value locations. The proceeds from theses sales will go directly into the coffers of the new owners.

The Austrian School has no influence whatsoever in present-day economics where the wealthy elite control the political class to use the state to protect and serve only their interests.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAS HAPPENED. GOOD CALL. :thumbup
Tman
Posts: 4129
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Wiki:Privatisation pro's and con's

Post by Tman »

Doesn't matter if you come from Austria to Zambia, money talks and that will never change.
Naive to believe it would/could ever be any different.