ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Treasury could lose £900 million in Royal Mail sell-off

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72542
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Treasury could lose £900 million in Royal Mail sell-off

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.labourlist.org/treasury_coul ... l_sell-off" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The proposed part privatisation of Royal Mail, as detailed in the Hooper Report, has taken another hammer blow today from new financial analysis carried out by Compass. It has found that the likely revenue that could be raised by a 49% sale of Royal Mail to an external equity partner would see the Treasury net less than half the value they would have secured just a year ago.

Should the Business Secretary, Lord Mandelson, succeed in railroading through Hooper's recommendations (breaking one of Labour's key 2005 manifesto commitments and Labour Party policy in the process), the price for a share of Royal Mail will be based on a multiple of 8 times earnings, conservatively estimated at £250 million for 2008/09. So in other words, a 49% stake would cost an external investor roughly £1 billion.

Of course, the financial downturn has a part to play in this calculation - as recently as last year the price would have been based on 15 times earnings. If Royal Mail were sold on those terms, the national coffers would be £1.9 billion better off in the short-term - almost double what Hooper's proposal would bring in now. The government must therefore look at the poor state of the market and come up with a new plan to modernise the Royal Mail that doesn't involve selling shares at rock bottom prices and losing hundreds of £millions in revenue in the process.
If you transpose this analysis onto the continental operators that Hooper uses as examples, there is a similar picture. If TNT had been sold at the height of the market in 2007 it would have been valued at around £11 billion. Today its sale would secure only £4 billion. Less than a year ago the sale of Deutsche Post would have secured around £21 billion, today it would be lucky to raise £8.5 billion.

Image

Nonetheless a sum of £1 billion could be seen as an attractive one-off windfall for a government struggling with its Budget during the current economic crisis. But why sell the family silver when this short term gain could be wiped out in less than two years if Royal Mail stays wholly public. With an annual profit of £630 million, which takes into account the funding of an annual £280m pension deficit and the loss of £100m in unfair access charges to private companies using the network, given these figures it is hard to see the attraction of a fire sale. Keeping these profits in public hands means they will be reinvested in the business to modernise it, could be used to provide better services and crucially money will not be lost through paying out dividends to shareholders.

John Grogan MP has today quite rightly urged the government to think again, and said that the findings show how "part privatisation would represent a bad deal for the government and for the British public. Labour MPs will now be even less likely to support part privatisation once they see these figures" - he's absolutely right.

Grave concern about a bad deal for taxpayers is broadened by the lack of interest in a part sale offer. Only TNT have shown any public interest, mainly because of the scarcity of available finance in the money markets for big ticket purchases like this.

Most worrying are the prospects for quality of service. Advisors to companies such as TNT and Deutsche Post will be telling their Chief Executives that they can increase their forward earnings through a cut price purchase of Royal Mail, allowing subsequent big cuts in jobs and services, which as one off costs are not included in forward earnings calculations.

So these findings will be very hard indeed to simply ignore, and gives further incontrovertible evidence that the Hooper report and proposed part-privatisation is a case not made. Even if you think it makes sense to sell, it makes no sense whatsoever to sell now.

Compass will shortly be publishing our own proposals and positive vision for a modernised post service that remains in public hands - keep an eye out for further updates on this important campaign.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
MEL
Posts: 75
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 22:53

Re: Treasury could lose £900 million in Royal Mail sell-off

Post by MEL »

why dont we buy tnt they seem 2 be struggling and 4 billion seems like a fair price 2 pay :neutral:
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Treasury could lose £900 million in Royal Mail sell-off

Post by DGP1 »

MEL wrote:why dont we buy tnt they seem 2 be struggling and 4 billion seems like a fair price 2 pay :neutral:
I'll throw in a tenner :Very Happy
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio