ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail shares

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by DGP1 »

britwrit wrote:Dear Telegraph journos, please use the following quotes as needed. Never said we don't aim to oblige.

"I would have sent in the form refusing my free shares except I was too busy burning the American flag and reading the collected writings of Ralph Miliband."

"If only Royal Mail had adapted to the challenge of the internet as well as the broadsheet newspapers of this country. I would love to have the job security of a reporter for the Daily Telegraph."

"I look forward to voting Yes to the strike, as it will give me more time to burn the American flag and joyously read the collected writings of Ralph Miliband, again."
:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle While I'm not into burning American flags (they get a bit tetchy over that) I think I'm going to get myself some Ralph Miliband writings............if only to piss of the DM :Very Happy
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
biscuit1957
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 161
Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 16:04
Gender: Male
Location: Swindon Mail Centre has given up

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by biscuit1957 »

DGP1 wrote:
britwrit wrote:Dear Telegraph journos, please use the following quotes as needed. Never said we don't aim to oblige.

"I would have sent in the form refusing my free shares except I was too busy burning the American flag and reading the collected writings of Ralph Miliband."

"If only Royal Mail had adapted to the challenge of the internet as well as the broadsheet newspapers of this country. I would love to have the job security of a reporter for the Daily Telegraph."

"I look forward to voting Yes to the strike, as it will give me more time to burn the American flag and joyously read the collected writings of Ralph Miliband, again."
:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle While I'm not into burning American flags (they get a bit tetchy over that) I think I'm going to get myself some Ralph Miliband writings............if only to piss of the DM :Very Happy
It seems funny, not ha ha funny, but it was a Canadian that shut the steel works,A Canadian that runs the Bank of England,Canada that owns the Lottery and A Canadian that is ruining the Royal Mail
There is a forgotten, well almost a forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.

That word is ENGLAND!!!
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by Lounge Lizard »

Michael Fallon urged posties to accept Royal Mail's pay offer of 8.6 per cent over three years, explaining: "It looks pretty reasonable compared to the 1 per cent a year cap for nurses, teachers and armed forces." :shock: But does Michael Fallon not have the sense to realise that nurses, teachers and the armed forces are all on far higher pay than us and so only need a lower pay increase ? :shock:
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72557
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Lounge Lizard wrote:Michael Fallon urged posties to accept Royal Mail's pay offer of 8.6 per cent over three years, explaining: "It looks pretty reasonable compared to the 1 per cent a year cap for nurses, teachers and armed forces." :shock: But does Michael Fallon not have the sense to realise that nurses, teachers and the armed forces are all on far higher pay than us and so only need a lower pay increase ? :shock:
and 8.6 over 3 years is peanuts compared to 11% over 1.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
genesis
Posts: 220
Joined: 29 May 2007, 21:04

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by genesis »

royalmailsajoke wrote:The CWU refered to people earning £19,000 a year, do they think we are all full-time then?
Typical though of this union to forget about the part-timers on s**t terms and conditions, no doubt they'll want them to stay out on strike to protect full -timers terms no matter what
The torygraph always uses the term spokesman ,a vague identity IE they just made it up about the cwu.
stephen500
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1458
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by stephen500 »

Sent e mail to CWU (again) asking for barrister's report as mandated by Policy forum.
Don't the union have to obtain this report and publish it as per the mandate.
I have till this fri to send off my opt out.
wandle
Posts: 944
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 17:17
Gender: Male

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by wandle »

barbario wrote:If our Union had ordered us to refuse our share's ,there would have been thousands more then just a hundred refusing.I for one would have sent that form back saying" stick it "ASAP.This was posted on another thread a couple of days ago that some plonker from the media would jump on this.So predictable.
You don't need to be 'ordered' to refuse the free shares. You're (presumably) a grown adult, capable of deciding of your own free will to tell RM to stick their shares :arrrghhh
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by Brain Fury »

Lounge Lizard wrote:Michael Fallon urged posties to accept Royal Mail's pay offer of 8.6 per cent over three years, explaining: "It looks pretty reasonable compared to the 1 per cent a year cap for nurses, teachers and armed forces." :shock: But does Michael Fallon not have the sense to realise that nurses, teachers and the armed forces are all on far higher pay than us and so only need a lower pay increase ? :shock:
Even assuming that the comment about nurses etc isn't garbage (which it really is) aren't posties being offered getting on for 3 times the maximum that these much more affluent members of society could get?
philip spiby
Posts: 24
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 17:02
Gender: Male

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by philip spiby »

Brain fury, what happens when the 3 years are up? Do you think they will offer another great 3 year deal, or will our wages be slashed by over 100 pounds a week. Everyone knows the pay rise is good but it's only for 3 years, how are people going to pay there mortgage with a 400 pound a month wage decrease in year 4. Providing they still got a job.
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by cloherty1976 »

philip spiby wrote:Brain fury, what happens when the 3 years are up? Do you think they will offer another great 3 year deal, or will our wages be slashed by over 100 pounds a week. Everyone knows the pay rise is good but it's only for 3 years, how are people going to pay there mortgage with a 400 pound a month wage decrease in year 4. Providing they still got a job.
How do you know this is going to happen. If this is the case obviously the support for the union will go for through the roof and support for a strike will be very high.
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by Lounge Lizard »

Brain Fury wrote:
Lounge Lizard wrote:Michael Fallon urged posties to accept Royal Mail's pay offer of 8.6 per cent over three years, explaining: "It looks pretty reasonable compared to the 1 per cent a year cap for nurses, teachers and armed forces." :shock: But does Michael Fallon not have the sense to realise that nurses, teachers and the armed forces are all on far higher pay than us and so only need a lower pay increase ? :shock:
Even assuming that the comment about nurses etc isn't garbage (which it really is) aren't posties being offered getting on for 3 times the maximum that these much more affluent members of society could get?
That's not the point. :crazy:
What percentage increase would we need for our pay to equate with what nurses, teachers and the armed forces are on ? :Very Happy
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by cloherty1976 »

Lounge Lizard wrote: What percentage increase would we need for our pay to equate with what nurses, teachers and the armed forces are on ? :Very Happy
Surely they are skilled workers and are held very highly in society looking after our kids,older generations and giving their lives to keep us safe
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by Brain Fury »

philip spiby wrote:Brain fury, what happens when the 3 years are up? Do you think they will offer another great 3 year deal, or will our wages be slashed by over 100 pounds a week. Everyone knows the pay rise is good but it's only for 3 years, how are people going to pay there mortgage with a 400 pound a month wage decrease in year 4. Providing they still got a job.
What do you mean it's only for 3 years? How many times in the past have you had a deal for longer than 3 years? I can understand people rejecting the 3 year deal in the hope of getting more but I can't understand rejecting it on the basis of a "year 4" scenario that you've completely made up.
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by Brain Fury »

Lounge Lizard wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:
Lounge Lizard wrote:Michael Fallon urged posties to accept Royal Mail's pay offer of 8.6 per cent over three years, explaining: "It looks pretty reasonable compared to the 1 per cent a year cap for nurses, teachers and armed forces." :shock: But does Michael Fallon not have the sense to realise that nurses, teachers and the armed forces are all on far higher pay than us and so only need a lower pay increase ? :shock:
Even assuming that the comment about nurses etc isn't garbage (which it really is) aren't posties being offered getting on for 3 times the maximum that these much more affluent members of society could get?
That's not the point. :crazy:
What percentage increase would we need for our pay to equate with what nurses, teachers and the armed forces are on ? :Very Happy
You really think that posties deserve the same pay as nurses and teachers? What is the average pay of a full time postman?
pinstripe
Posts: 2465
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: Only a hundred posties snub offer of free Royal Mail sha

Post by pinstripe »

Brain Fury wrote:
What do you mean it's only for 3 years? How many times in the past have you had a deal for longer than 3 years?

How many times have RM actually honoured a 3 year deal? I mean fully honoured all existing parts of it? They don't exactly have a very reassuring record.