ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Pension Surplus

Royal Mail pension news and discussion.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 793
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Hyrrokkin »

mphill007 wrote:
20 Dec 2024, 15:30
Part of the surplus has come direct from RMPP members wages both still employed & retired.So part of it should be used to benefit the members who have paid this in through improved pension benefits.Lets hope the trustees see it this way and not the RM/CWU way!
The fact that the CWU seem to be on board with this is a disgrace as far as i am concerned.
It is OUR money for OUR pension
mphill007
Posts: 9
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 11:45
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by mphill007 »

Looks like CWU will be using it like the Escrow fund to use as a share out bung to smooth through pay deals! 🤷‍♂️
Wullie10
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 662
Joined: 30 Jul 2017, 12:07
Gender: Male
Location: Retired

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Wullie10 »

My knowledge of these things is basic , but the Government insit that pension funds must purchase "" safe "" bonds ie Government debt. As the Government borrow more and more the interest on these bonds increases. Hence the pension funds have surplus money , which the Government would love to get their hands on ? Someone with better knowledge of these things tell me I'm wrong ? Seems like a giant ponzi scheme to me .
milly
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1233
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 09:43

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by milly »

Wullie10 wrote:
22 Dec 2024, 13:13
My knowledge of these things is basic , but the Government insit that pension funds must purchase "" safe "" bonds ie Government debt. As the Government borrow more and more the interest on these bonds increases. Hence the pension funds have surplus money , which the Government would love to get their hands on ? Someone with better knowledge of these things tell me I'm wrong ? Seems like a giant ponzi scheme to me .
The Government do indeed operate a Ponzi scheme, hence the need for more and more immigrants to fund Pensions,
The Government are no different to the Mafia, they have a monopoly on violence, extort money and commit fraud.
Kevin.r.smith
Posts: 42
Joined: 19 Aug 2014, 07:20
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Kevin.r.smith »

Milly stop talking rubbish
milly
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1233
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 09:43

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by milly »

Kevin.r.smith wrote:
22 Dec 2024, 16:04
Milly stop talking rubbish
What parts were rubbish?
Perhaps, you could explain how the welfare system isn't a Ponzi scheme, if I'm talking rubbish.
sweepster70
Posts: 487
Joined: 24 Jul 2017, 23:16
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by sweepster70 »

I believe the government and Ep group have agreed that the surplus cannot be moved out of Royal Mail. So it can fund a lot of things, possibly even pay rises?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... mJnZVQPTpx
It's right at the bottom.
heapsy
Posts: 2928
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 23:40
Gender: Male
Location: Drinking with Gangsters

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by heapsy »

sweepster70 wrote:
22 Dec 2024, 18:00
I believe the government and Ep group have agreed that the surplus cannot be moved out of Royal Mail. So it can fund a lot of things, possibly even pay rises?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... mJnZVQPTpx
It's right at the bottom.
You cannot use pension funds, to increase pay.
Not sure, but don't think funds can be used to lower the NRA of the scheme either. The unions should never have agreed to an NRA of 67. Way too late for most delivery staff.
RobertT
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 6548
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 14:26
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by RobertT »

A pension surplus could, and in my opinion should, be used to improve the benefits of it's members, which could mean higher pensions or potentially changes in NRA. Although both would clearly increase the scheme liabilities going forward.
The RMPP trustees do have some say on this and they should definitely be looking after their members interests, ahead of anything else.

The CWU's initial idea of using the RMPP surplus to lower the NRA of a completely different scheme(the RMCPP), was total pie in the sky in my view. And the fact it doesn't seem to form part of the recent announcements, is no great surprise.

If a company receives any pension surplus, I don't think there's anything stopping them from using it for whatever they choose, pending any agreements with unions. That could potentially include staff pay rises or lump sums, aswell as investing in the company.
But I doubt if staff benefits will be high on the list of priorities.
The recent blurb says the money will stay within RMG, but if it's owned by Kretinsky he's likely to be the one gaining the most from it.
Links to all RM pension related websites are here
mphill007
Posts: 9
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 11:45
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by mphill007 »

More than likely the CWU are hoping to use this surplus as a lump sum pay deal sweetener like the escrow fund.Benefiting CWU members over RMPP members which is an absolute disgrace and 🤞 the trustees see through this.
Wullie10
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 662
Joined: 30 Jul 2017, 12:07
Gender: Male
Location: Retired

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Wullie10 »

The money could be used to improve the supplement paid before state pension age. Would give ageing postman a more realistic option of going before 67. So in a round about way would fulfil the unions idea of lowering the nra. And it wouldn't eat into the surplus all that much either.
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 793
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Hyrrokkin »

Why cannot the members who paid into this receive x amount but it can only go into a personal pension/SIPP/AVC etc
TopperGas
Posts: 3077
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by TopperGas »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
26 Dec 2024, 20:59
Why cannot the members who paid into this receive x amount but it can only go into a personal pension/SIPP/AVC etc
The CWU clearly want to please as many of their members as possible, not just those in the closed pension scheme.
heapsy
Posts: 2928
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 23:40
Gender: Male
Location: Drinking with Gangsters

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by heapsy »

Wullie10 wrote:
26 Dec 2024, 20:48
The money could be used to improve the supplement paid before state pension age. Would give ageing postman a more realistic option of going before 67. So in a round about way would fulfil the unions idea of lowering the nra. And it wouldn't eat into the surplus all that much either.
They couldn't improve the supplement without discriminating against other section members. Only section C members get it.
Wullie10
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 662
Joined: 30 Jul 2017, 12:07
Gender: Male
Location: Retired

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Wullie10 »

heapsy wrote:
27 Dec 2024, 16:38
Wullie10 wrote:
26 Dec 2024, 20:48
The money could be used to improve the supplement paid before state pension age. Would give ageing postman a more realistic option of going before 67. So in a round about way would fulfil the unions idea of lowering the nra. And it wouldn't eat into the surplus all that much either.
They couldn't improve the supplement without discriminating against other section members. Only section C members get it.
That's why I mentioned it wouldn't eat into the sum a huge amount ( not everyone wants to go before NRA ) . Obviously others would have to be compensated somehow. Either way it ought to go to members in some form of other but sadly That's very unlikely.