rwbarker wrote:Hey c'mon. We may disagree about how the Crown network should be run, but dishing out personal abuse is not necessary. It's a good job I'm not a sensitive soul. The reason I won't enter into debate in this forum is that I don't know whom I'm debating with. Give me a call and I'd be happy to talk. Richard 07796 698395.
Absolutely agree about the personal abuse comment – I am sure you are genuinely doing your best to do your job. That doesn’t mean I have to approve of what you do. As a 25 year plus bod, I have a tie to this organisation, and I think some bad mistakes have been made, principally on the focus, to the exclusion of everything else, on Sales, resulting in terrible Waiting Time performance, and now it seems concerns over efficiency. This is by no means all your fault or within your control, but you are there to promote policy, and convince we minions of that policy.
With regard to entering into a debate on this forum, the fact is that only a small minority of staff know of its existence, and an even smaller number actively contribute. Are we the disaffected few, or do we accurately represent the views and feelings of the majority of our colleagues? And does it matter anyway? I think I generally reflect the view in my own office, but then our office is a pretty poor place to work in terms of low moral etc.
It would be wrong for you to engage in an argument here, but I would be interested in your comments on the five points I made above.
I am anonymous because you are in a position to make life difficult for me – assuming you are who you say you are!
