ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72385
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

https://www.itv.com/news/2026-03-11/mps ... se-parcels

Image

MPs have accused Royal Mail of “lying” about its performance and “pretending” not to prioritise parcels over letters.

It comes after concerns Royal Mail is not meeting Ofcom targets for timeliness in its deliveries, potentially leading to millions of letters arriving late.

Labour MP Dave Robertson said people in his constituency are “sick of being lied to by Royal Mail”.

The Lichfield MP said on Wednesday: “I met Royal Mail just before Christmas to complain to them about the total lack of a postal service that we have in Lichfield. We were probably the worst area in the country at that point.

“I was told when I had that meeting that all of the first class mail went out that week. That is a lie, it is an absolute lie, because my constituents told me. Royal Mail clearly don’t have a handle on this – they are either not measuring their performance or they are covering up their performance.”

Subscribe free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning.

He called on the government to force Royal Mail to “be honest, ‘fess up and fix it”.

Business minister Blair McDougall said he understands how “frustrating” it is for MPs to “raise a problem and be told that it doesn’t exist”.

“Royal Mail have a responsibility absolutely to address that in a direct and straightforward manner, because if we aren’t recognising the problem, we’ll not deal with it,” he added.

Several MPs alleged Royal Mail prioritises parcels, contributing to the late delivery of letters and leading to some customers missing important information, such as medical appointments.

In a letter published this week by the Commons Business and Trade Committee, chief executive Alistair Cochrane said Royal Mail does not “operate a general policy of prioritising parcel deliveries over letters”.

He said delivering parcels before letters was only prioritised during busy periods like Christmas to avoid them overcrowding delivery offices, but admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.

Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller (Chichester) said the blame for failures "doesn’t lie with postal workers" who are "doing all they can to deliver a service".

“But it lies with a private company that is telling their staff to prioritise parcels and then pretending that that’s not their policy. Constituents in my area of Chichester have received hospital appointments four days after the appointment was due to take place,” she said.

Royal Mail and Ofcom bosses summoned to Parliament over delivery delays

Royal Mail says scrapping of second-class Saturday post must roll out 'urgently'
Labour MP Ian Lavery (Blyth and Ashington), who had raised the urgent question on the matter, said Royal Mail's denial over operating a parcels-first policy was "contradicting repeated internal testimonies" and "flies in the face of local evidence from the workforce”.

It is "a standing joke that the quickest way to get a letter delivered is to put it inside of a parcel", Labour MP Lee Barron (Corby and East Northamptonshire) said.

Responding, Mr McDougall said: “On the issue of the prioritisation of parcels, Ofcom had examined this a few years ago and had found that there wasn’t evidence of it as a policy centrally.

“But I’ve heard from so many members' stories about the prioritisation of parcels, and so it’s something I intend to raise with Ofcom later this afternoon.”
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.May use chatgp to generate posts
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
Retired
Mr Rush
Posts: 2964
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by Mr Rush »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 13:24
chief executive Alistair Cochrane [...] admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.
Count the cut-offs. Isn't that what the DODR is?

Pairing is hammered with packets. Side A goes out. Side B doesn't. Here you go: 700 DPs x 30% callrate = a minimum of 210 de-prioritised letters. They throw numbers at us all the time. This is just being obtuse.
The machine stops.
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 830
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by scotchy1962 »

Mr Rush wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 23:10
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 13:24
chief executive Alistair Cochrane [...] admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.
Count the cut-offs. Isn't that what the DODR is?

Pairing is hammered with packets. Side A goes out. Side B doesn't. Here you go: 700 DPs x 30% callrate = a minimum of 210 de-prioritised letters. They throw numbers at us all the time. This is just being obtuse.
I know sometimes people hammer RM for trying to blind folk with science, now i am sure what you have written means something to some people but if you really want to get your point across you need to use layman terms, i sort of get some of it, the rest is just a bit of a hawkings formula to me.
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3893
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by ted_e_bear »

scotchy1962 wrote:
13 Mar 2026, 10:07
Mr Rush wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 23:10
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 13:24
chief executive Alistair Cochrane [...] admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.
Count the cut-offs. Isn't that what the DODR is?

Pairing is hammered with packets. Side A goes out. Side B doesn't. Here you go: 700 DPs x 30% callrate = a minimum of 210 de-prioritised letters. They throw numbers at us all the time. This is just being obtuse.
I know sometimes people hammer RM for trying to blind folk with science, now i am sure what you have written means something to some people but if you really want to get your point across you need to use layman terms, i sort of get some of it, the rest is just a bit of a hawkings formula to me.
I think DODR is the acronym for whatever the managers report is called so claiming they don't have data for the amount of mail that lies undelivered is also untrue as it should have been reported in the DODR.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72385
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

What is DODR? Internal code meaning: Delivery Office Delivery Review — a hold.

Why is it used? When the Delivery Office cannot deliver due to a lack of resources or operational issues.

Does it apply to letters? Yes it should

Does it apply to parcels? Yes, it should.

Is it a public tracking status? No — it’s internal only.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.May use chatgp to generate posts
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
Retired
jessicarabbit
Posts: 606
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
Gender: Female

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by jessicarabbit »

Every office has to complete the DODR every day. Delivery Office Daily Report It details which rounds failed completely or in part which feeds into national disruption list that Postman posts daily. All done on percentages. 3 walks uncovered in a 10 walk office is a 30% failure. They also complete a separate report detailing 1c left and number of Delivery points not covered or attempted.

This is where it gets interesting. Some COMs believe (have been told) that if you do the tracked on a delivery you've attempted X number of delivery points on that walk so they don't report it as failing completely. Also some COMs believe (have been told) if you don't prep the round it is a work plan failure and you can report it as mail on hand not due for delivery as it hasn't reached prep stage.

As a wise man once said there are 3 types of lies....Lies, damned lies and statistics.

Every COM (the huge majority) are born liars and they can't tell the truth even if they wanted to as they would be told to re report it in a different way if the OPL was under too pressure to get off the list or show he has control of his COMs.
mrcurve
Posts: 112
Joined: 23 Nov 2011, 19:27
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by mrcurve »

I am pretty certain the USO was lost during covid, once the business got use to no longer meet the standards it improved profits, probably why the strikes failed too, hard to put pressure on a business who no longer wanted to meet the USO.
It’s quite expensive to deliver the USO, you need far more staff and vans to deliver every day, other couriers only need to go when someone buys an item, Royal Mail is also stuck delivering all the items customers have not ordered too, bills etc.
Mr Rush
Posts: 2964
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by Mr Rush »

jessicarabbit wrote:
13 Mar 2026, 22:43
Some COMs believe (have been told) that if you do the tracked on a delivery you've attempted X number of delivery points on that walk so they don't report it as failing completely.
Counting the packets being done as a partial failure may explain discrepancies between observed reality and an office appearing or not appearing on the list. Packet callrates are around 10-20%, so once again we have a logical absurdity that an entire office could do nothing but packets for days on end and not a single frame is classed as a full failure. In my opinon, since the great majority of packets are Tracked (which are not USO-covered products) then their delivery ahead of a frame full of letters should not be counted as fulfilling to any degree the service obligation.
jessicarabbit wrote:
13 Mar 2026, 22:43
Also some COMs believe (have been told) if you don't prep the round it is a work plan failure and you can report it as mail on hand not due for delivery as it hasn't reached prep stage.
We had that happening for a while after the pandemic. That stopped happening around the time the last DOM got busted which seems to imply it was a technicality being ab-... mistakenly used to improve unit performance.
The machine stops.
yellowbelly
Posts: 3583
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by yellowbelly »

jessicarabbit wrote:
13 Mar 2026, 22:43
Every office has to complete the DODR every day. Delivery Office Daily Report It details which rounds failed completely or in part which feeds into national disruption list that Postman posts daily. All done on percentages. 3 walks uncovered in a 10 walk office is a 30% failure. They also complete a separate report detailing 1c left and number of Delivery points not covered or attempted.

This is where it gets interesting. Some COMs believe (have been told) that if you do the tracked on a delivery you've attempted X number of delivery points on that walk so they don't report it as failing completely. Also some COMs believe (have been told) if you don't prep the round it is a work plan failure and you can report it as mail on hand not due for delivery as it hasn't reached prep stage.

As a wise man once said there are 3 types of lies....Lies, damned lies and statistics.

Every COM (the huge majority) are born liars and they can't tell the truth even if they wanted to as they would be told to re report it in a different way if the OPL was under too pressure to get off the list or show he has control of his COMs.
As a wise man once said there are 3 types of lies....Lies, damned lies and statistics.
Our office reports failures.

I've seen the different ways posties write down on a sheet what they've failed:

Two loops (how big?)
Two rows (how big?)
Rural part (how big?)
Town part (how big?)
150 addresses with letters (1c or 2c?)
No mail service to two rows total of 240 addresses (how many letters?)
50 addresses with second class only

No consistency at all. Manager doesn't query it, so how can the figures be reported correctly/if at all?
Ad_bee
Posts: 127
Joined: 09 Dec 2019, 14:03
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by Ad_bee »

mrcurve wrote:
14 Mar 2026, 07:21
I am pretty certain the USO was lost during covid, once the business got use to no longer meet the standards it improved profits, probably why the strikes failed too, hard to put pressure on a business who no longer wanted to meet the USO.
It’s quite expensive to deliver the USO, you need far more staff and vans to deliver every day, other couriers only need to go when someone buys an item, Royal Mail is also stuck delivering all the items customers have not ordered too, bills etc.
In my office it began 2017/18 and they tried to keep it under the counter.

Rounds uncovered and people coming back from leave or days off to find a weeks or yesterdays mail waiting.

It wasn't universal.

On the affected rounds they deployed B&H by way of threatening Conduct Code and simply striking-out any claimed overtime or refusing overtime.

The office Reps weren't interested since they were in-house and the two who tried were hounded-out and not supported by the unaffected majority.

When Covid hit, RM made it universal and open must have thought all of their Birthdays had arrived at once.

Thats 8 years ago.
mrcurve
Posts: 112
Joined: 23 Nov 2011, 19:27
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by mrcurve »

Oh yes, your right about that, I had forgotten, Staff taking a day off and having 2 days of work when you came back.
Simon Thompson never had to meet the USO, and they made a good profit, probably helped by the cages full of 1c tracked covid tests, so our striking to defend the USO when its not important to the CEO, and the public had got used to a poorer service, must have been an impossible situation for the CWU.