ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Is this fair?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Rage24
Posts: 140
Joined: 07 Mar 2010, 18:06
Gender: Male

Is this fair?

Post by Rage24 »

1 month ago postie goes to door with challenge 25 item, they believe person is over 25, they ask for year or birth, age is 19, person hands over item.

It's a secret shopper, person is is put on disciplinary because they didn't ask for i.d.

Person has worked for royal mail for 20 years and had no other major mistakes and genuinely thought they could hand over item.

Also since this time royal mail has released posters saying 'we are now making it clearer when you need to ask for i.d' therefore it wasn't clear in the first place?
sindba
Posts: 1447
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by sindba »

Rage24 wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:12
1 month ago postie goes to door with challenge 25 item, they believe person is over 25, they ask for year or birth, age is 19, person hands over item.

It's a secret shopper, person is is put on disciplinary because they didn't ask for i.d.

Person has worked for royal mail for 20 years and had no other major mistakes and genuinely thought they could hand over item.

Also since this time royal mail has released posters saying 'we are now making it clearer when you need to ask for i.d' therefore it wasn't clear in the first place?
Afraid so.

There's been no shortage of briefings about this recently.
Rage24
Posts: 140
Joined: 07 Mar 2010, 18:06
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by Rage24 »

sindba wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:24
Rage24 wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:12
1 month ago postie goes to door with challenge 25 item, they believe person is over 25, they ask for year or birth, age is 19, person hands over item.

It's a secret shopper, person is is put on disciplinary because they didn't ask for i.d.

Person has worked for royal mail for 20 years and had no other major mistakes and genuinely thought they could hand over item.

Also since this time royal mail has released posters saying 'we are now making it clearer when you need to ask for i.d' therefore it wasn't clear in the first place?
Afraid so.

There's been no shortage of briefings about this recently.
Yep recently, starting from a a couple of weeks ago, not much before that.
yellowbelly
Posts: 3650
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by yellowbelly »

sindba wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:24
Rage24 wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:12
1 month ago postie goes to door with challenge 25 item, they believe person is over 25, they ask for year or birth, age is 19, person hands over item.

It's a secret shopper, person is is put on disciplinary because they didn't ask for i.d.

Person has worked for royal mail for 20 years and had no other major mistakes and genuinely thought they could hand over item.

Also since this time royal mail has released posters saying 'we are now making it clearer when you need to ask for i.d' therefore it wasn't clear in the first place?
Afraid so.

There's been no shortage of briefings about this recently.
We've not had a briefing about this, although the other day when I had an age verification, I had to select whether I'd seen passport or drivers licence.
The chap was in his seventies....if I selected neither the prompt was you had to deliver it the next day!

But then the next day had another age verification and it didn't do this. Wonder if they were just testing something out......
Rage24
Posts: 140
Joined: 07 Mar 2010, 18:06
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by Rage24 »

yellowbelly wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 17:01
sindba wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:24
Rage24 wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:12
1 month ago postie goes to door with challenge 25 item, they believe person is over 25, they ask for year or birth, age is 19, person hands over item.

It's a secret shopper, person is is put on disciplinary because they didn't ask for i.d.

Person has worked for royal mail for 20 years and had no other major mistakes and genuinely thought they could hand over item.

Also since this time royal mail has released posters saying 'we are now making it clearer when you need to ask for i.d' therefore it wasn't clear in the first place?
Afraid so.

There's been no shortage of briefings about this recently.
We've not had a briefing about this, although the other day when I had an age verification, I had to select whether I'd seen passport or drivers licence.
The chap was in his seventies....if I selected neither the prompt was you had to deliver it the next day!

But then the next day had another age verification and it didn't do this. Wonder if they were just testing something out......
Yeah this is something they have changed on the pdas since the initial incident.
sorefeet17
Posts: 291
Joined: 11 May 2015, 17:10
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by sorefeet17 »

It's pretty hard to bypass the security on the scanner by mistake, that being said we recently had weeks in our area of the age verification items just coming up as normal tracked on the scanner.
kazardaimenu
Posts: 1391
Joined: 13 Apr 2022, 19:11
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by kazardaimenu »

Half the time people can’t find their house keys let alone their passport. Cut offs will be even more common if they want ID. Fair enough if they are young but if they are clearly old enough you shouldn’t need it.
GRS
Posts: 813
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

Re: Is this fair?

Post by GRS »

And stop asking for f*****g age verification for normal run of the mill items. Knocking a door last week & explained to a customer that as the parcel was an age verification item I needed her year of birth (which she willingly gave). She was baffled though as the parcel contained a jumper & some colouring books!! In our office posties have had this for things like a cat litter tray & dinky cars.
A2B
Posts: 1911
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by A2B »

Sounds like they are trying to catch people out to be honest

We have been reminded about the procedure multiple times over the last month
GRS
Posts: 813
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

Re: Is this fair?

Post by GRS »

A 19 year old is employee by RM to sit at home & be a secret shopper. Really???
barrychuckle
Posts: 144
Joined: 16 Jan 2008, 17:40

Re: Is this fair?

Post by barrychuckle »

Most of our new starters are youngsters under the age of 25. Should they be allowed to handle/deliver age verification parcels. 🤔
postmanzach
Posts: 515
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 15:01
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by postmanzach »

names not dan..

i.d
of jtfo
GRS
Posts: 813
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

Re: Is this fair?

Post by GRS »

barrychuckle wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 20:33
Most of our new starters are youngsters under the age of 25. Should they be allowed to handle/deliver age verification parcels. 🤔
That’s a bloody good point. In a shop a sales assistant cant for example sell alcohol, paracetamol etc if they’re under a certain age (probably 18).
funkflex55
Posts: 713
Joined: 04 Sep 2022, 22:58
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by funkflex55 »

yellowbelly wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 17:01
sindba wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:24
Rage24 wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:12
1 month ago postie goes to door with challenge 25 item, they believe person is over 25, they ask for year or birth, age is 19, person hands over item.

It's a secret shopper, person is is put on disciplinary because they didn't ask for i.d.

Person has worked for royal mail for 20 years and had no other major mistakes and genuinely thought they could hand over item.

Also since this time royal mail has released posters saying 'we are now making it clearer when you need to ask for i.d' therefore it wasn't clear in the first place?
Afraid so.

There's been no shortage of briefings about this recently.
We've not had a briefing about this, although the other day when I had an age verification, I had to select whether I'd seen passport or drivers licence.
The chap was in his seventies....if I selected neither the prompt was you had to deliver it the next day!

But then the next day had another age verification and it didn't do this. Wonder if they were just testing something out......
Doesn't the pda ask of the customer looks over 25? Maybe if you click no then it asks for the id type but if you click yes then that question doesn't appear. It seems crazy to see a driving license for someone that is 70+. It also seems a bit personal asking for year of birth. Someone buying a kitchen knife to commit murder (even though they have a kitchen full) could easily lie about their age. They could also have fake ID. Them what? Are we supposed to analyse it using our fake ID training. Bottom line is, if someone is crazy enough to want to stab someone. No amount of RM nonsense will stop them.
Mr Rush
Posts: 3144
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: Is this fair?

Post by Mr Rush »

funkflex55 wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 21:54
They could also have fake ID. Them what? Are we supposed to analyse it using our fake ID training.
I had one where the guy was under 25 and had to ask him to fetch either a driver's licence or passport per PDA instruction. Luckily I had delivered the latter just recently so it didn't take too long. I thought maybe the next step would be scanning the passport, although I realised the GDPR implications of that would be a worse crime than any hypothetical stabbings. All I looked at was the photo and the DOB. I never even thought to look for holograms or any other security feature because whilst I've signed four different sheets about AV items, I have no training whatsoever when it comes to authenticating valid ID.

Anyway, is there a glut of steak knives on the international market lately?
The machine stops.