ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Attendance Standards
-
HappyGuy
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 01 Apr 2023, 10:12
- Gender: Female
Attendance Standards
Ok, i know this may be controversial.
Something has always puzzled me about the Royal mail attendance standards.
In the middle of winter when its freezing outside and windy with rain.
I wake up with a stinking cold or flu and have to go and walk 10 miles in the appalling weather.
Yet if i worked in the mail centre i could have a crap day inside away from the elements.
However when it comes to attendance standards we in delivery are treated much more harsh. I know this is true I have experience of both workplaces.
Something has always puzzled me about the Royal mail attendance standards.
In the middle of winter when its freezing outside and windy with rain.
I wake up with a stinking cold or flu and have to go and walk 10 miles in the appalling weather.
Yet if i worked in the mail centre i could have a crap day inside away from the elements.
However when it comes to attendance standards we in delivery are treated much more harsh. I know this is true I have experience of both workplaces.
-
thefox
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
This should be good
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: Attendance Standards
If you are indoors with a contagious infection you stand a good chance of passing it on to your colleagues.
On delivery you are outside, mainly on your own, and therefore less likely to catch whatever your colleagues have.
Working in a MC is far more dangerous than on delivery.
On delivery you are outside, mainly on your own, and therefore less likely to catch whatever your colleagues have.
Working in a MC is far more dangerous than on delivery.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
HappyGuy
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 01 Apr 2023, 10:12
- Gender: Female
Re: Attendance Standards
Haha is that the best you can do?
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12140
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
Attendance standards are the same in both MCs and DOs. If you feel you're treated more harshly, then you need a better rep.
In a DO do you basically stay in the same work area? In a MC you can potentially find yourself being in every last work area over the course of a shift, so more potential for picking up colds, flu and other viruses.
In a DO do you basically stay in the same work area? In a MC you can potentially find yourself being in every last work area over the course of a shift, so more potential for picking up colds, flu and other viruses.
-
Woody Guthrie
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
I can only think you're trolling because that is blatantly not true.Working in a MC is far more dangerous than on delivery.
There are roughly 100 people in my DO in the morning working in far closer proximity than in any Mailcentre section in a far smaller area.
These members then share a van with other members in most cases in a very unhygienic space.
Then they interact with all kinds of surfaces and customers while their immune system is depressed through fatigue and weather conditions.
Then there are the added risks from slips, trips and falls in places and conditions where no safety rep has ventured, dogs, junkies, vehicles, falling pianos etc...
The potential risks on delivery are pretty much endless because pretty much anything can and will happen in the outside world whereas the dangers in a Mailcentre are known and therefore should be contained.
Only dead fish follow the current
-
Barrybarry
- Posts: 37
- Joined: 16 Apr 2023, 08:42
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
Don’t forget driving the van with an headache etc very dangerous
-
A2B
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
Waiting for the first row when a postie comes into work but is unfit to go out on delivery.
DOM has no indoor work for them and wants them to go sick, postie says no as they will not be paid, who's in the right?
DOM has no indoor work for them and wants them to go sick, postie says no as they will not be paid, who's in the right?
-
postieblueshirt
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
The postie because il do exactly that.Il lay on my frame and sleep if I have to as long as I've scanned in.
-
postieblueshirt
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
Sorry disagree with that in an average morning you can be on ips then sort oversized then box in someone else's sequenced or manual or put in there d2d spreading yer manky cold over everyone's stuff.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑10 Aug 2023, 19:46Attendance standards are the same in both MCs and DOs. If you feel you're treated more harshly, then you need a better rep.
In a DO do you basically stay in the same work area? In a MC you can potentially find yourself being in every last work area over the course of a shift, so more potential for picking up colds, flu and other viruses.
-
deadbox
- Posts: 357
- Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51
Re: Attendance Standards
Yet your a cheer leader for the deal that the union struck, I myself have attended work this week with a stinking cold , have infected a close working colleague who is now coughing and spluttering because I cannot afford to go sick just in case I get sick later in the year, all because I won’t get paid for any second absence I have if I’m unlucky to get contract a virus etc. you reap what you sow !Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑10 Aug 2023, 20:23I can only think you're trolling because that is blatantly not true.Working in a MC is far more dangerous than on delivery.
There are roughly 100 people in my DO in the morning working in far closer proximity than in any Mailcentre section in a far smaller area.
These members then share a van with other members in most cases in a very unhygienic space.
Then they interact with all kinds of surfaces and customers while their immune system is depressed through fatigue and weather conditions.
Then there are the added risks from slips, trips and falls in places and conditions where no safety rep has ventured, dogs, junkies, vehicles, falling pianos etc...
The potential risks on delivery are pretty much endless because pretty much anything can and will happen in the outside world whereas the dangers in a Mailcentre are known and therefore should be contained.
-
deadbox
- Posts: 357
- Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51
Re: Attendance Standards
Ps. He also has a heart condition! But under the latest deal, that’s his look out, every man go themselves nowdeadbox wrote: ↑11 Aug 2023, 00:05Yet your a cheer leader for the deal that the union struck, I myself have attended work this week with a stinking cold , have infected a close working colleague who is now coughing and spluttering because I cannot afford to go sick just in case I get sick later in the year, all because I won’t get paid for any second absence I have if I’m unlucky to get contract a virus etc. you reap what you sow !Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑10 Aug 2023, 20:23I can only think you're trolling because that is blatantly not true.Working in a MC is far more dangerous than on delivery.
There are roughly 100 people in my DO in the morning working in far closer proximity than in any Mailcentre section in a far smaller area.
These members then share a van with other members in most cases in a very unhygienic space.
Then they interact with all kinds of surfaces and customers while their immune system is depressed through fatigue and weather conditions.
Then there are the added risks from slips, trips and falls in places and conditions where no safety rep has ventured, dogs, junkies, vehicles, falling pianos etc...
The potential risks on delivery are pretty much endless because pretty much anything can and will happen in the outside world whereas the dangers in a Mailcentre are known and therefore should be contained.
-
Woody Guthrie
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
I was never a cheerleader for this deal.Yet your a cheer leader for the deal...
I always made it clear I thought the deal was poor.
Like the majority of members I did realise that the union had played all its cards, achieved all it was going to achieve, the members needed some kind of resolution and the alternative to this poor agreement was much worse.
Not all positions are polemic despite what social media would have you believe.
Only dead fish follow the current
-
scotchy1962
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 866
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
The vote is over, yes won the day. Democracy in action.deadbox wrote: ↑11 Aug 2023, 00:05Yet your a cheer leader for the deal that the union struck, I myself have attended work this week with a stinking cold , have infected a close working colleague who is now coughing and spluttering because I cannot afford to go sick just in case I get sick later in the year, all because I won’t get paid for any second absence I have if I’m unlucky to get contract a virus etc. you reap what you sow !Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑10 Aug 2023, 20:23I can only think you're trolling because that is blatantly not true.Working in a MC is far more dangerous than on delivery.
There are roughly 100 people in my DO in the morning working in far closer proximity than in any Mailcentre section in a far smaller area.
These members then share a van with other members in most cases in a very unhygienic space.
Then they interact with all kinds of surfaces and customers while their immune system is depressed through fatigue and weather conditions.
Then there are the added risks from slips, trips and falls in places and conditions where no safety rep has ventured, dogs, junkies, vehicles, falling pianos etc...
The potential risks on delivery are pretty much endless because pretty much anything can and will happen in the outside world whereas the dangers in a Mailcentre are known and therefore should be contained.
I am not happy about the result but raking over the coals and trying to use it to slap somebody in the face with is pointless. We need to put it in the past and concentrate on the task at hand, stopping RM tramping over the top of us that are still in this job.
The unions has little enough power to fight with and us scrapping amongst ourselves doesn't help.
I work in delivery and therefore think i have the harder job, somebody else works in MC and should think the same, you won't get a definitive answer as we all believe we work harder/longer than each other.
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Attendance Standards
scotchy1962 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2023, 07:34The vote is over, yes won the day. Democracy in action.deadbox wrote: ↑11 Aug 2023, 00:05Yet your a cheer leader for the deal that the union struck, I myself have attended work this week with a stinking cold , have infected a close working colleague who is now coughing and spluttering because I cannot afford to go sick just in case I get sick later in the year, all because I won’t get paid for any second absence I have if I’m unlucky to get contract a virus etc. you reap what you sow !Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑10 Aug 2023, 20:23I can only think you're trolling because that is blatantly not true.Working in a MC is far more dangerous than on delivery.
There are roughly 100 people in my DO in the morning working in far closer proximity than in any Mailcentre section in a far smaller area.
These members then share a van with other members in most cases in a very unhygienic space.
Then they interact with all kinds of surfaces and customers while their immune system is depressed through fatigue and weather conditions.
Then there are the added risks from slips, trips and falls in places and conditions where no safety rep has ventured, dogs, junkies, vehicles, falling pianos etc...
The potential risks on delivery are pretty much endless because pretty much anything can and will happen in the outside world whereas the dangers in a Mailcentre are known and therefore should be contained.
I am not happy about the result but raking over the coals and trying to use it to slap somebody in the face with is pointless. We need to put it in the past and concentrate on the task at hand, stopping RM tramping over the top of us that are still in this job.
The unions has little enough power to fight with and us scrapping amongst ourselves doesn't help.
I work in delivery and therefore think i have the harder job, somebody else works in MC and should think the same, you won't get a definitive answer as we all believe we work harder/longer than each other.