pay offer

jafferpants · Post by **jafferpants** » 23 Jun 2007, 10:07

I'm getting a bit concerned guys. Has no one noticed that since the vote for a strike went through the reasons seem to have gone out of the window. from the outset it was about the strings that came with the offer and not the offer itself. Having seen dave ward on TV twice since the vote he has stated both times the money on offer was not enough and not a word about the conditions that came with it. he needs to understand that if those conditions get through he will no longer have a union to to defend.

Big Tone · Post by **Big Tone** » 23 Jun 2007, 10:29

Er....just a SLIGHT difference yes.

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 23 Jun 2007, 11:30

Your right Jaffer - a pay rise of 2.5% not good but I would take it on its own. even if it was 4.8% with those strings - not a chance.

phantomshare · Post by **phantomshare** » 23 Jun 2007, 11:34

of course he's mentioned the strings, MODERNISATION...

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 23 Jun 2007, 11:45

Modernisation is different I don't mind that it has to happen. The strings I don't want are, summer lapsing (with no extra pay), more door to doors , no nights, and later starts

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 23 Jun 2007, 11:46

and I don't want dodgy shares.

vigilante · Post by **vigilante** » 23 Jun 2007, 21:53

It's in one hand and two out the other with those proposed strings