Stay out and complete?

[clashcityrocker]

And what a ramshackle way to run a postal service, to make it dependent on staff working overtime. As soon as staff say no, or when they idiotically banned overtime, the USO is in instant backlog. Run by morons.

You do all realise that the understaffing of offices to ensure overtime opportunities has been CWU policy since the year dot.

[Foxel]

Employing people costs extra money ( insurance, annual leave,sickness) it is still much cheaper for the company to throw OT at the remaing staff.

And not getting rid of staff is even cheaper.

[aiden01]

And what a ramshackle way to run a postal service, to make it dependent on staff working overtime. As soon as staff say no, or when they idiotically banned overtime, the USO is in instant backlog. Run by morons.

You do all realise that the understaffing of offices to ensure overtime opportunities has been CWU policy since the year dot.

Exactly.

[Barnacle]

And what a ramshackle way to run a postal service, to make it dependent on staff working overtime. As soon as staff say no, or when they idiotically banned overtime, the USO is in instant backlog. Run by morons.

You do all realise that the understaffing of offices to ensure overtime opportunities has been CWU policy since the year dot.

Exactly.

I doubt that the current levels of understaffing were what the CWU had in mind.