ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Non Drivers

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
claretandblue
Posts: 900
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 12:14

Re: Non Drivers

Post by claretandblue »

Acca Dacca wrote:
03 Mar 2025, 21:33
Martin Walsh has said today that they will be trialing non drivers doing IPS/Prep of Mondays mail on the Saturday and also trialling them being ''van assistants'' to assist with delivery of 1st class/tracked to see which is more viable
If everyone gets a van assistant then nobody will be getting Saturday off :arrrghhh
scoobydo79
Posts: 2031
Joined: 15 May 2011, 19:04
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by scoobydo79 »

Dexydog wrote:
03 Mar 2025, 21:44
Van assistants?!🤦🤦🤡🤡
Ahh like the old days. I was a Christmas runner. Driver pulls up and you leap out deliver parcel and jump back in then off to the next call lol
Perseus
Posts: 1009
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by Perseus »

This whole idea has had very little thought put into it.
CWU says there is still a full role for non driving staff whilst taking away one day of the week that they can perform that. Choosing a Saturday only for 1st class and packets isn’t the fault of non driving staff, so there is a very strong argument for them working Monday to Friday every week with weekends off. Obviously this has created a fuss with other staff so an idea to create a role on a Saturday has been quickly thought up. As someone else said, if you have too many ‘van assistants’ then no one gets any Saturdays off. Who gets a van assistant and who doesn’t?
The van assistants will get more Saturdays off too, CWU confirmed this yesterday, and for every assistant you need a driver, so less time off for them too.
nuisance
Posts: 215
Joined: 06 Oct 2016, 12:57
Gender: Female

Re: Non Drivers

Post by nuisance »

Is anyone honestly going to be keen on having a "van assistant"?
Perseus
Posts: 1009
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by Perseus »

nuisance wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 10:38
Is anyone honestly going to be keen on having a "van assistant"?
No one wants a 'van assistant' and no one wants to be one either. It's 2 people doing the same job when one of them could be having the day off.
toonshola
Posts: 898
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 16:31
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by toonshola »

nuisance wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 10:38
Is anyone honestly going to be keen on having a "van assistant"?
Was quite looking forward to at least working on my own on the Saturday shifts instead of van sharing. Van assistant sounds even more annoying than van share park and loop.
When will the union and the company acknowledge that this job works better when on your own rather than being paired up. Being paired up is the most inefficient way to deliver things, we are the only company in our industry that does this ridiculous practice.
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3967
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by ted_e_bear »

Perseus wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 15:28
nuisance wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 10:38
Is anyone honestly going to be keen on having a "van assistant"?
No one wants a 'van assistant' and no one wants to be one either. It's 2 people doing the same job when one of them could be having the day off.
That's what I thought, but thinking a bit further if it's still someone doing parcels and 1c for 2 duties on Saturdays then what's the savings in having an extra person "van assistant" helping, those same 2 people previously would have been delivering everything on both duties, I predict if you have an assistant so 2 up in a van you'll probably be expected to do all the parcels for 3 duties not just 2.
Perseus
Posts: 1009
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by Perseus »

ted_e_bear wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 16:15
Perseus wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 15:28
nuisance wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 10:38
Is anyone honestly going to be keen on having a "van assistant"?
No one wants a 'van assistant' and no one wants to be one either. It's 2 people doing the same job when one of them could be having the day off.
That's what I thought, but thinking a bit further if it's still someone doing parcels and 1c for 2 duties on Saturdays then what's the savings in having an extra person "van assistant" helping, those same 2 people previously would have been delivering everything on both duties, I predict if you have an assistant so 2 up in a van you'll probably be expected to do all the parcels for 3 duties not just 2.
There's no savings to be had having 2 people in a van on a Saturday at the expense of failing duties Mon-Fri. How much extra work a driver/van assistant would get when paired up would never be able to be worked out as there are just too many factors to consider. Saturday indoor work/van assistant has been thought up because many people won't like the idea of some staff potentially getting every weekend off, which in my view seems a dead cert.
thefox
Posts: 1151
Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by thefox »

It's inevitable that non drivers are gonna end up mon-fri,not gonna be popular but it will happen.
qwerty2
Posts: 2011
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: Non Drivers

Post by qwerty2 »

thefox wrote:
04 Mar 2025, 17:31
It's inevitable that non drivers are gonna end up mon-fri,not gonna be popular but it will happen.
But even drivers are going to get more Saturdays off than they do now
Rommagic
Posts: 1465
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52

Re: Non Drivers

Post by Rommagic »

Less people in on Saturdays means given work from other walks.